Jump to content

User talk:TFNT8719

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BeingObjective (talk | contribs) at 20:03, 1 December 2023 (→‎WP:RS on Foundation tv Topic.: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, TFNT8719, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 04:50, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS on Foundation tv Topic.

I have no opinion on the matter - but I did revert the changes - if you have an RS - cite it and revert - it cannot be just your opinion - you might be correct - but WP:RS requires supporting the original delete you made.

Hope that makes sense.

Dr. BeingObjective (talk) 20:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know how sourcing works. I quickly edited it on my phone and didn't bother including the link under the assumption that no one apparently cared enough this page to bother checking since inaccurate information with thin sourcing had been left published for months, but I guess people were too busy deciding on whether the show could be deemed an "adaptation." ;)
Standards need to be upheld, though, so thank you. TFNT8719 (talk) 02:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have really no clue, I liked the first season, liked the original books.
I could have left it - but thought it was worth a citation.
Many thanks and cheers Dr.BeingObjective (talk) 04:26, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that the third season has been confirmed here, so the sourced content that was removed should be restored, and any further discussion had on the article talk page. (pinging BeingObjective) - wolf 04:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay - I have no information - Just a passing edit. Likely needs correcting. by@TFNT8719
Dr. BeingObjective (talk) 05:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Thewolfchild, the article you linked to explicitly states that it hasn’t been renewed yet: “Foundation season 3 has yet to be officially renewed, as Apple TV+ hasn't made a commitment to another season amidst the ongoing WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes.” TFNT8719 (talk) 16:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ensuring WP:RS.
Change what you will - it takes more effort to communicate with me than to change the article.
Doctor BeingObjetive MD. BeingObjective 17:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The point is that in updating the article, there doesn't need to be a solid, black & white confirmation that the show has been renewed for another season to add content about the goings-on with the writers and the production team. If there is some filming taking place, as reported in sources, that can be added. If the creatives attached to the show have made sourced comments about plans for the story going forward, that can be added. Anything that is sourced and relevant can be added, that is how articles are built. - wolf 17:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure who that was targeted at.
Sure, totally.
I unsubscribed from this chat.
Doctor BeingObjetive MD. BeingObjective 20:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TFNT8719&oldid=1187845671"