User talk:B ryan 1994
Speedy deletion nomination of User:B ryan 1994
[edit]You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on User:B ryan 1994, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 07:27, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
This page should not be speedy deleted because...
[edit]This page should not be speedy deleted because it is the documented history of a company or business. There are no prices listed, nor is there any promotion of any product. --B ryan 1994 (talk) 22:53, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
This page should not be speedy deleted because...
[edit]To quote G11, "Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion." If there is a specific thing you would like me to change that would make you feel less offended by this article, please let me know.--B ryan 1994 (talk) 23:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)