Talk:Multnomah Community Ability Scale
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Psychology Stub‑class | |||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Oregon Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Multnomah Community Ability Scale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051029104420/http://www.sheppardpratt.org/Documents/MCAS%20Anchors-Aug-2000.pdf to http://www.sheppardpratt.org/Documents/MCAS%20Anchors-Aug-2000.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.ontario.cmha.ca/cmhei/docs/cmhei_working_paper_02-01.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
How current?
It seems to me that it would be so easy to edit that phrase "developed in Multnomah County" to turn it into "developed in [year or decade] in Multnomah County". Do I believe that a lot of articles about mental health deliberately obscure that the date of some assertions, theories, or research is the 18th century? What I believe isn't relevant. Someone who reads this article and sees that the date isn't there, and who is predisposed to believe that the mental health professions (or even ALL professions) obscure facts in order to prevent the public from knowing everything that the public should know in order to intelligently debate whether an idea is hooey or not, will believe that the omitted date is part of a conspiracy. If the research in Multnomah County was done in the 19th century, the public have a right to know that because it bears on the issue of how credible the research IS. And likewise if the research was done in the 2010s.2600:1700:6759:B000:1C64:8308:33BC:E2D6 (talk) 21:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Christopher Lawrence Simpson