Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (5th nomination)

Sputnikmusic

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic
• Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (3rd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (4th nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (5th nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Sputnikmusic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All passing mentions or refs to the cite itself. There are some hits on a WP:BEFORE but nothing that seems to meet WP:SIGCOV imo. BuySomeApples (talk) 12:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

• Keep : I am puzzled that this website can be nominated again for deletion for its notability. I just read through the references listed in the article for deltion and I read that the website is cited as a reliable source in published books, academic works and mainstream magazines. After a quick search, I found some magazines and newspapers that cite Sputnikmusic as a reliable source (The Florida Times-Union [1], Classic Rock [2], Verve [3], Loudwire [4]). The website is still listed among the generally reliable sources in Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources and in the Metacritic engine. My best guess is that all the parameters for notability are checked. Lewismaster (talk) 11:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Websites. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 12:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)