Talk:Parvocellular cell

Anatomy: Neuroanatomy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to neuroanatomy.

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A

Kanita Beba —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.178.91.131 (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC) A wee bit ridiculous to call the main article parvocellular part. Should just refer to the adjective in my opinion. Orimlig 23:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree. How do we change that? Bakerstmd 23:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC) parvocellular is a pathway in visual system which carries chromatic visual information. never have heard about parvocellular 'parts' though!!!![reply]

I suspect the problem is connected with Wikipedia's insistence on being distinct from a dictionary. "Parvocellular" ("parvicellular" in my medical dictionary) cries out for an explanation, but until an appropriate treatment is proposed and publicized, what can we do? Unfree (talk) 19:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retinal ganglion

I notice that the words "retinal ganglion" constitute a link to the article, "Ganglion cell," and that there is no article named "Retinal ganglion," suggesting that there is no such thing. Is that true? Unfree (talk) 18:55, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]