Talk:1904 Clemson Tigers football team
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Independent
[edit]@MisterCake: Per WP:BURDEN, I've reverted your edit. There was a not an offered WP:RS which cited "SIAA" membership, while there is a RS for Independent in use. UW Dawgs (talk) 23:15, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- K Cake (talk) 10:51, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- Where's the year, on prior pages? You do understand the point of the citation is to clearly pair the team, sport, year, and conference per WP:V? UW Dawgs (talk) 21:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- DeSaulles' treatment of Football in the South reads on page 89 ""As pointed out in the Spalding Guide of 1903..", to further evidence his treatment is of the 1904 season, which on page 93 clearly lists Clemson as part of the SIAA. Cake (talk) 21:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Link(s), page(s), and quote(s) per WP:BURDEN, please. This should not be a chore for anyone to verify. UW Dawgs (talk) 22:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- DeSaulles' treatment of Football in the South reads on page 89 ""As pointed out in the Spalding Guide of 1903..", to further evidence his treatment is of the 1904 season, which on page 93 clearly lists Clemson as part of the SIAA. Cake (talk) 21:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Where's the year, on prior pages? You do understand the point of the citation is to clearly pair the team, sport, year, and conference per WP:V? UW Dawgs (talk) 21:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class college football articles
- Mid-importance college football articles
- WikiProject College football articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class South Carolina articles
- Unknown-importance South Carolina articles
- WikiProject South Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles