Jump to content

Talk:Kalaburagi district

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 12:29, 25 January 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Article more about Gulbarga than Gulbarga District.

[edit]

I feel that the article is more about the city/town of Gulbarga than the District of Gulbarga. Hence i'm proposing a move to Gulbarga. Regards. Swaroop (talk) 14:06, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No; there is already an article about the city , even if it is under another name. The content about the city should be moved to that article, and its name should be reconsidered. Imc (talk) 18:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
not possible, there is already an article about gulbarga, the article gulbarga district is about the entire region of gulbarga district where as the article gulbarga contains only about gulbarga city. thanks--Omer123hussain (talk) 05:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gulbarga district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Gulbarga which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]