Talk:Castlecomer

Coal mining town?

Article reads that it is a coal-mining town, but coal-mining is not mentioned in employment details. 76.102.1.193 (talk) 21:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Castlecomer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120217095720/http://www.nisranew.nisra.gov.uk/census to http://www.nisranew.nisra.gov.uk/census

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Castlecomer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Castlecomer Railway

The current entry could probably do with a slight tweak as the railway was initially set up by the British around 1919-1921 owned by it's own Company until absorbed by the GSR in 1925 though the GSWR. I currently don't want to make significant changes as I am focused elsewhere. I have just noticed this article does not link to the Deerpark Mines article and will do minimal linking/improvement in this respect. I may also create a redirect article for the Castecombe Railway/Castlecombe Colliery Railway.Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC) I am currently of the mind consolidating and developing the Castlecomer Colliery branch railway on the Deerpark Mines article is probably the correct strategy ... but this is for the longer term.Djm-leighpark (talk) 19:02, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wandesforde Family

I've visited this article with a focus on the railway, but believe the dealings of the Wandesford/Wandesforde family and Brennan clan have not been developed as much as might be possible. I've tweaked the history section slightly, but there is likely more that can be done, though exactly what can be done without undue article disruption is beyond me.Djm-leighpark (talk) 19:02, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]