Talk:The 100 Scariest Movie Moments

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 24 April 2022, see discussion.
nomination withdrawn, 1 June 2011 (UTC), see discussion.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This page has come under scrutiny for possible acts of vandalism. The top 3 "scariest movie moments" were inconcise with the listing found at the Bravo website found here: http://www.bravotv.com/The_100_Scariest_Movie_Moments/index.shtml. I fixed the vandalism but the site is now in need of a description of the three scenes in question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ToledoSuperman (talk • contribs) 02:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stats

Resolved

The stats section is a very hard to read and excessively linked pile-up of statements that would be much better of put into a table format, e.g. as a listing of person:number-of-entries:name-of-entries. 88.77.189.22 (talk) 07:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This apparently was fixed. Looks fine now. Rivertorch (talk) 23:45, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Speedy Template

I've added a WP:SPEEDY tag to the head of the article. The list itself is certainly a copyright violation, as I doubt reprinting it counts as fair use in any way. The Stats section likely violates WP:OR, and the list of interviewees probably doesn't meet the standards of WP:N. I've notified Edgehawk [1], as he is the only non-IP user to have recently edited the page. Given that I am a relatively inexperienced user, I apologize if I've incorrectly tagged the page and would appreciate further advice as to the best way of dealing with this. As a note, 30 Even Scarier Movie Moments, which this article links to, is probably G12 too, though I'll wait to see the reaction to this before I tag that. Cheers, Archaeo (talk) 11:28, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me. Really, I was just appalled by the writing and fixed what I could. You are probably right about infringement, though, which I did not even think about. I have no problem with this being whacked ASAP. Edgehawk (talk) 21:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the list?

Why isn't the full 100, or at least part of it, printed in this article? Some guy above mentions copyright violation but you Wikipedia people are too strict on copyright. Why doesn't Wikipedia move its servers to a country in Europe with more sensible laws about copyright where knowledge comes before the "rights" of big business?--109.228.75.116 (talk) 18:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFC, Wikipedia should not include "A complete or partial recreation of "Top 100" or similar lists where the list has been selected in a creative manner. Articles on individual elements from such lists can discuss their inclusion in these lists." - this may well be too strict, but it's the current consensus on this kind of content. --McGeddon (talk) 17:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, my friend (who happens to be all the way back in 2010), the list is on here now. --Matthew (talk) 22:44, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia hasn't changed its stance on including copyrighted content since 2012 - the article can mention elements of the list, but should not include the whole thing. --McGeddon (talk) 08:50, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]