Jump to content

Talk:Nikon Coolpix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 15:26, 30 January 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Why is there a picture of the Nikon Coolpix 3200, but no article about it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gordeonbleu (talk • contribs)

2000? 2500?

Where do my own Coolpix 2000 and its slightly more upmarket brother the Coolpix 2500 fit in? They're not mentioned at all! I know they're discontinued, but so's the 5100 and that gets a mention. Besides, this is a description of the Coolpix range, not a catalogue of current models. Loganberry (Talk) 12:16, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm being bold and adding mention of the 2000 and 2500, since I know they exist - and I own a 2000! Loganberry (Talk) 21:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

4800 discontinued??

I don't think the 4800 was discontinued, I think they're still available. I changed this in the article, if I'm wrong, please revert that edit.

It came out in 2004...I picked one up at Sears for a discount price of $100. Ritz is alos clearing them out as well. I don't know if it's an official discontinuation or not. Hbdragon88 04:14, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tech forum

Wikipedia isn't a discussion forum for technical problems of cheap cameras, but can the article point the way to sites where I could ask why my 2200 doesn't zoom? Jim.henderson 00:40, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USB plug

I've been told the Micro-B plug on most Coolpixes is non standard, that is won't accept any but Nikon's USB cable. Is there a listing which tells which ones do accept a standard cable? 71.247.65.93 05:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganise?

Maybe the product list should be reorganised as a table, because it is getting a little long. Maybe it could be similar to the one on the Canon IXUS page, with technical data for the cameras. Black Sabre (talk) 12:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Screen Units...

Would it be worthwhile having screen sizes in just inches or should metric measurements be included? As most, if not all screen sizes are provided in inches. Black Sabre (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tabulate Lists

Would anyone be opposed to having the lists in this article converted to a table? Because it's getting a little messy. The tables would be similar, but not identical to the ones at the Canon Digital IXUS article [SCΛRECROW]CrossCom 2.0 05:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please keep an eye on Coolpix 2100

Can someone please watch Coolpix 2100. It was created earlier today as a one-liner with no content - certainly not enough to warrant being a standalone article - by a new editor. This editor then continually reverted my change to make it a redirect to this article. Now an IP editor is doing the same. Rather than get in trouble for 3RR I would appreciate someone here taking it on - unless of course you think that the single sentence does merit it being an article rather than a redirect! --Biker Biker (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coolpix L22 resolution

Coolpix L22 resolution is 4000x3000, not 3264x2448 (correct for L21) as shown in the chart. (I have an L22 here in my hands.) I'll get the publishing info for the user manual and update this comment with that.

For Coolpix L22, there is also a resolution above the default 4000x3000 resolution. It's listed with a star following, like 4000x3000* Does anyone know if that's RAW? User documentation was little help, other than saying it was 4:1 compressed instead of 8:1.

146.129.29.106 (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Todd Land: w.todd.land@gmail.com[reply]

Ah, yes. You are correct, thanks for spotting that error. I am not sure what the res followed by a star means.SCΛRECROW 05:48, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That’s probably JPEG with different compression/quality settings. --AVRS (talk) 12:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikon Coolpix S9100.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Nikon Coolpix S9100.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:06, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P7100

Hello.

There isn't the Coolpix P7100 in this page. --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mention the E and other series

Great. You don't mention E700, E800, E880, E900... until a tiny line at the end,

Well I added "Coolpix 5xxx ... Note some cameras are numbered 5xxx on front, and E5xxx on bottom."

Maybe it affects more! Jidanni (talk) 04:28, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P310 superseded by P330

The Coolpix P330 replaced the P310 in March 2013. Changes include a larger, lower resolution sensor and built-in GPS. Perhaps someone might like to update this page accordingly. Robbiemorrison (talk) 23:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Cameras

The L 29 P 340 P600 S 02 S 9700 Are not on the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.114.199.248 (talk) 09:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neither is the S3600. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 18:22, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

P5100 CCD Sensor

Article states that P5100 has CMOS sensor. Nikon website says it's a CCD sensor. http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Product-Archive/Compact-Digital-Cameras/COOLPIX-P5100.html

Willisian (talk) 16:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Nikon Coolpix series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:59, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Nikon Coolpix series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:08, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 10 external links on Nikon Coolpix series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 56 external links on Nikon Coolpix series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nikon_Coolpix&oldid=1200936251"