Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Total Drop
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:34, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Total Drop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems quite borderline, but I couldn't establish that it meets WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we cannow resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 19:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - no claim let alone evidence of notability, apart from the arguably notable groups the members went on to be part of. Llajwa (talk) 17:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.