Talk:Mujahedeen Secrets

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from Mujahideen Secrets 2 was copied or moved into Mujahedeen Secrets with [permanent diff this edit]. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Mojahideen Secrets 2

Even the term Mujahideen tends to be spelled Mujahideen (with a "u" after the "m"), the spelling the authors of the software gave to it shows it being spelled Mojahideen (with an "o" after the "m"). So since this is how the software authors spell the name of the software, I believe it would be correct to spell the software's name that way, rather than the traditional spelling of Mujahideen with a "u". So this article's title and all references to the software should be spelled Mojahideen Secrets 2. Animedude5555 (talk) 20:38, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non Sourced or Referenced

This might be subject to summary deletion since there is no serious references or citations for this, and the article is in any event less than a stub. The single source offered is Schneier's blog, and while Schneier is considered to be one of the very top most excellent security researcher and writer in the arena of cryptology, the article is woefully... lame.

Can we get a soclitication effort going to request editors to flesh this out better, add some tagging to invite editors to improve this? Damotclese (talk) 16:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]