Talk:South Woodstock, Vermont

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 July 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

nature of NRHP HD

I removed the following comment about the NRHP HD mentioned in the article: "Consisting primarily of a federally-administered park,^[1] the district was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1982."
Reference

^ U.S. Geological Survey Geographic Names Information System: South Woodstock Historic District

The claim that the HD is largely a park does not appear to me to be borne out by the source. From the "definitions" link from that page, it sounds like the GNIS listing is for the NRHP HD district itself, and "park" including cultural features and administered by government is the closest choice it could get to saying it is a historic district that is listed on the National Register.

I'll withdraw my AfD request to delete this article, as it is documented now that there is a place of this name, but it seems unfair to others to have to do the documentation. The article should not have been started, in my view, and it still could perhaps better be merged into the Woodstock, Vermont article. doncram (talk) 23:25, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1] U.S. Geological Survey Geographic Names Information System: South Woodstock Historic District

[1]