User talk:Gary

"Graziani + Corazza" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Graziani + Corazza has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10 § Graziani + Corazza until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 02:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Nominations viewer

Hi Gary, I don't think we've ever 'met' before, so hello! I have, however, seen your work in action with the nominations viewer. I've been mulling over its output and was wondering if a possible improvement is technically possible.

At the moment the output at FAC is as follows:

(nomination · 3 weeks old · Active today · 1 nominator · 6 participants · 2 supports)

Is there a way it can pick up and report when a source and image review has been passed or failed?

(nomination · 3 weeks old · Active today · 1 nominator · 6 participants · 2 supports · Pass source · Fail media)

The fields can remain empty until those technical reviews are undertaken, which will make it more clear which still need to be done. I'd need to run this through FAC talk to get buy-in from the wider community, but thought I'd see it it's technically viable before floating the idea more widely. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 09:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

If someone wants to build this feature, then go for it, but I don't have the time to do so. Most importantly, whoever is performing these reviews must follow a standard convention, so that it's easy for the script to pick up on it. Gary (talk) 17:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

List of Los Angeles Rams head coaches at WP:FLRC

I have nominated List of Los Angeles Rams head coaches for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Mario Kart DS

Mario Kart DS has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Call of Duty 2

Call of Duty 2 has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. λ NegativeMP1 05:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for PHP

PHP has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Sohom (talk) 08:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)