Talk:IPtronics

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Binaifaa (talk) 20:36, 10 May 2009 (UTC) This is an objective article about a technological company, which there are plenty of in wikipedia, e.g. Intel, STMicroelectronics, NEC, etc.[reply]

Your argument is basically what WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS sums up. I don't think this company is notable in any way, and you haven't added any sources to back it up either. GraYoshi2x►^talk 21:25, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Binaifaa (talk) 21:44, 10 May 2009 (UTC) Thank you for the help. More references are being added.[reply]

Binaifaa (talk) 13:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC) More references are in the process of being added to further support the notability of this company.[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on IPtronics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719132508/http://www.ue.dk/nyhedsarkiv/5921.aspx to http://www.ue.dk/nyhedsarkiv/5921.aspx
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.iptronics.com/37456/IPtronics%20Incorporated/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://fibresystems.org/cws/article/newsfeed/32972
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110305124306/http://www.iptronics.com/36209/Optical%20interconnects.html to http://www.iptronics.com/36209/Optical%20interconnects.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713053957/http://www.iptronics.com/37829/ to http://www.iptronics.com/37829/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]