Talk:Alan Loney

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutral Point of View

While this article is actually quite good, it can be improved in two respects. First, a more neutral point of view could be used when describing Mr. Loney's accomplishments. Phrases like "Alan Loney is Alan Perress Loney, writer, poet, editor, publisher and printer, is a man of words," don't add any factual content to the article and give the impression that the author is pushing a favourable view of Mr. Loney. Second, section headings would help to organize the article so that one does not have to read the entire article to find a single fact. Quanticle (talk) 03:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As the author I partially agree with the above comment. As I do admire the work of Alan Loney I may have been overly enthusiastic. I have now edited the page to give a more 'neutral' point of view —Preceding unsigned comment added by PD Thompson (talk • contribs) 18:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have done a bit of editing to make the text a little more neutral (I think it was still rather hagiographical). I hope you will agree that it is now, more or less, objective and factual. By the way, I edited the Private Library article by Alan which is cited, so know a little about his life and work (and am also a "fan"). Paulwnash (talk) 11:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article could still do with a clean-up - Perhaps separating biographical and professional details? I've seperated the introduction/summary at the opening of the article from the material I've now put under "Early Life and Work", and added his current location as Melbourne to that summary, following the style of other bio articles. I do think that the article could do with some stylistic editing to fit in with general wikipedia style, eg other articles on living poets, etc. Ross.Brighton (talk) 09:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]