Talk:Namuwiki

Korea High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2019 and 28 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kanraru. Peer reviewers: Realyuang, Reinako.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

POV

The whole Criticism section may be valid, but its written in such a way that the neutrality of the content is in question. There are basic conjecture statements with no sources at all. Needs some serious cleanup with some secondary sources supporting it, written from a more neutral POV. Evaders99 (talk) 06:31, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Evaders99: I've updated the article, removed some unreferenced content/errors, and I think it is neutral now. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:33, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfree license

How can the website run ads when the license is non-commercial? Do the terms of use grant a special commercial license to the website host? And how was such a license obtained from the authors of the pre-fork content? Nemo 14:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nemo bis: I think it's pretty clear that the site doesn't care much about copyrights. I expect it has a ton of copypaste content too that nobody polices. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the article

I've tried my best in putting more content and rewriting some of the information on this article to be more neutral and informative. I tried to address both the neutrality concern on Gender Equalism section on Controversies, and also the non-commercial issue towards the end of Administration section. There's no clear answer within the site towards this issue either, so I had to leave it off in that state. Let me know if there are fixes to be had. Kanraru (talk) 10:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

General Writing

I've cleaned up most of the writing; it was clear most of it was written by those less proficent in English. Bibliac (talk) 07:34, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Namuwiki logo.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]