User talk:Kintetsubuffalo

/archiveJan3106, January 31, 2006
/archiveSep2506, September 25, 2006
/archiveApr207, April 2, 2007

Fair use rationale for Image:AusOWS.png

Thanks for uploading Image:AusOWS.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 04:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Thailandc.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Thailandc.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 04:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"I invoke a policy that I don't usually invoke"

Is there a reason for you to be smug in your edit summaries? It's bad enough you are self-imposed arbiter of images on articles you've contributed nothing to. I appreciate your improvement of the graphics themselves, but I disagree with the decisions you make about them. Chris 05:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to be smug. You are welcome to keep the images, but I want to know what they are of. This information is critical to a claim of fair use, and I asked you to provide it before. I do not enjoy enforcing this policy, although it must be enforced on all images in the end because of the Board's unfree content resolution. Other users are more rigorous about enforcing this policy. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 05:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cheshire talk page template

Thanks for your comment on the talk page. If you look on the project page, there is a box containing important sub-pages (at the top, next to the shortcut box), and in that is a link to Templates and so on. Following that link will give you the template you were looking for (amongst others). If you have a suggestion as to how this could be made more clear, please feel free to suggest it, as we would welcome ways in which to imporove things. DDStretch (talk) 10:17, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen this template?

{{R from merge}}? I just created {{Scouting redirect from merge}}. Just an FYI. --evrik ^(talk) 14:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stevia mistagged

Hi. I notice you tagged the stevia article as part of the chemistry wiki-project. This article isn't about chemistry, it's about a species of plant, its history, political controversies, commercial uses, health effects, regional names, etc.

The article you should tag instead is steviol glycoside, which is about the specific chemicals extracted from the stevia plant. Would you mind please moving the tag to the correct article? -Amatulic 23:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Foreign relations

I created the project, which you can see on Wikipedia:WikiProject Foreign relations. I invite you to participate in this project! I'm still expanding the project by making templates and such.--Ed ^{¿Cómo estás?} 01:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that this project will likely necessitate extreme vigilance to maintain WP:NPOV standards. I applaud you effort, but advise extreme care and caution in your endeavor. Best of luck, and happy editing! SkipperClipper 03:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Hi, did you get an email I sent about a week ago? It's sort of irrelevant now, but I want to make sure your email is working. KazakhPol 03:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]