Jump to content

Talk:Mylapore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 14:56, 6 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject India}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Montykillies (talk) 09:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

A nice page. Congrats! --Bhadani 16:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Please include the fact that arrival of St Thomas is highly questionable. For a complete review of this subject visit hamsa.org

History Seection

[edit]

St Thomas

[edit]

The discussion on St. Thomas shows a strong bias and cited a resource that had a clear adgenda. The text was changed to remove the bias and match the rest of the article.

Text on FEB 19 2010: "Mylapore is also recently 'claimed' to be associated with the legend of St. Thomas, who was supposedly to have been buried at a place called Mylapore. But this theory was disputed by Vatican and it declared that St.Thomas was buried in Vatican. A short biography of St.Thomas supposedly mentions a six year long association of the Apostle with Mylapore. But 'The Myth of St.Thomas' by Koenraad Elst postulates that St.Thomas might have never visited Mylapore and Malabar was the only place to be visited by him."

Changed text: "Christians regard Mylapore as the original burial site of St. Thomas the Apostle, before his body was moved to Edessa.[10] The San Thome Basilica stands on this site. [11]"


Religious issues are inherently controversial. Let us limit ourselves to STATING what a certain religious group believes, and not write endless arguments for or against a religious view. An encyclopedia's purpose is to STATE information, anything else makes the article appear unprofessional.

JNG71886 (talk) 04:29, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly object to the St Thomas martyrdom reference. The sources quoted are just PoV and do not offer proof. There is no archaeological record of Christianity in TN before the 16th century — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.206.115.236 (talk) 13:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thiruvalluvar

[edit]

I have a similar opinion here about arguing as I did with the St Thomas section. I made some changes but, I would appreciate it if someone would verify it. I know more about the subject of St Thomas.

Text removed: "although this claim is disputed[1]. "

Statements "it is said" or "(a certain group) regards/believes" establish that the subject is controversial and not accepted by all. No further arguments are necessary. JNG71886 (talk) 04:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ 'Thiruvalluvar from Kanyakumari not Mylapore', Yahoo News,April 26, 2005

Temple section needs clearing up

[edit]

While going through the rest of the page, I didn't edit the temple part as I am not that well informed about it. A lot of it is lacking in neutral POV (as an example, while Kapaleeshwarar is very impressive I think it is a bit too far to say 'one of the most important in the world', given the sheer number of other significant temples found in Tamil Nadu). Needs an expert to have a look over it. Juskei (talk) 17:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mylapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mylapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mylapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mylapore&oldid=1204157192"