Jump to content

Talk:Zero-ohm link

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 03:01, 7 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Incorrect statement?

[edit]

Shouldn't it be "zero" instead of "infinite" in the following part of the article?

... a fractional tolerance (as a percentage of the zero-ohm ideal value) would be infinite ...

--Mortense (talk) 06:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed it to "zero". Please step forward if you disagree. --Mortense (talk) 10:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Say the value is between and . The tolerance is then . In the case of a zero ohm resistor the tolerance is thus .Bomazi (talk) 22:21, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Useful Information

[edit]

-- Kuldeep Singh Dhaka (kuldeepdhaka9@gmail.com) Sat 11 2014 08:25 (IST)

a nice conversation on this topic (especially at the last message) http://www.edaboard.com/thread24453.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.254.223.76 (talk) 14:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Design considerations

[edit]

The "Design considerations" sections reads like a howto and is missing sources. I'm suspecting this is original research and the need to route high current (around/above 10 A or so) through a zero ohm link is probably quite rare and at least not typical for most electronics. I suspect that at this point the quality of the soldering and surface/size of pads and so on has a much higher impact than the supposed resistance of a zero ohm link. In any case, these dubious claims should be well sourced or I'd vote to remove them. -- Jonathan Haas (talk) 07:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]