Talk:Sonchiriya

This article was nominated for deletion on February 11, 2018. The result of the discussion was Delete.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Unclewalker (talk) 14:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC) the principal photography of the movie is completed.[reply]

Link : https://www.hindustantimes.com/bollywood/bhumi-pednekar-is-a-fierce-dacoit-in-son-chiriya-first-look/story-KZod463R4BbDWsuvUSHBUI.html

Not sure the source does say this, it seems to be saying that portions of the film (and some publicity shots) have been made, not principle photography. Perhaps you could provide the quote, as maybe I am missing it.Slatersteven (talk) 14:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined G4 speedy deletion on the grounds that principal photography is claimed to have been completed now, and it looks like some investigation is needed to determine if that is the case. If it turns out that the film has not progressed sufficiently since the AFD discussion (link above), please feel free to revert my decline of the deletion request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nope I just objected to the creator doing it (which is not allowed).Slatersteven (talk) 14:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you're saying "Nope" about, as I didn't say anything about your correct reinstatement after the author removed it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I mean that I am happy with your actions and would not undo them.Slatersteven (talk) 14:27, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, understood! Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:37, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]