Talk:Xarchiver

[untitled]

recomendations of compression programs to be added both in the article itself and the in comparison table.

1. NanoZip @NanoZip.net

NanoZip is an upcoming file archiver. It consists of several original compressors, put into a single file archiver program. The project goal is the highest possible compression efficiency.

2. FreeArc @FreeArc.org

FreeArc is a modern general-purpose archiver. FreeArc is fast but efficient compression and rich set of features.

Advantages:

- Free, open-source, with console and GUI versions for both Windows and Linux. - Includes LZMA, PPMD, TrueAudio and generic Multimedia compression algorithms with automatic switching by file type. - Filters that further improve compression: REP (finds repetitions at the distances up to 1gb), DICT (dictionary replacements for texts), DELTA (improves compression of tables in binary data), BCJ (executables preproccesor) and LZP (removes repetitions in texts). - Special compression algorithms are used in fast compression modes (GRZIP for texts and Tornado for binary data). - Overall, 11 compression algorithms and filters are included (compared to 3 in 7-zip and 7 in RAR) and this number still grows. - Smart file sorting that groups similar files together and fully customizable sorting order. - Typically, FreeArc works 1.5-3 times faster than best programs in each compression class (ccm, 7-zip, rar, uharc -mz, pkzip) while retaining the same compression ratio; from technical grounds, it’s superior to any existing practical compressor.

Disadvantages:

Compared to RAR and 7-zip, FreeArc at this moment lacks the following: multi-volume archives, 64-bit version, storing of file attributes/extended timestamps/NTFS streams in the archive, bcj2, data segmentation. These are planned to be fixed in subsequent versions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.163.99.66 (talk) 01:05, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Xarchiver. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://xarchiver.sourceforge.net/doc/ch01s03.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xarchiver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080726042314/http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130110-page,2-c,linux/article.html to http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130110-page,2-c,linux/article.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)