Talk:Bitten (novel)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Novels: Fantasy Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Also See Section

I was wondering whether we actually needed the 'also see' section at the bottom of this article. There are already links to the author's page within the text and the infobox, so that particular link seems a little unnecessary. The other books in the series are also listed on the author's page, and of course if you follow the infobox through it is possible to go through all the books in the series because it links to previous and next books in the series. Would it be acceptable to remove this section as a little surplus to requirements? What do others think? Silverthorn 08:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think removing them is fine as it's really unnecessary. -- 9muses 03:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As there were no objections, I have removed this section. Silverthorn 10:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Movie

Do we have a link or citation to support this statement in the Trivia section? It may well be correct, but it seems safer to be able to provide evidence in case it gets challenged. Silverthorn 10:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to track down a couple of links for this. Silverthorn 11:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary

Why is it that the plot summary of this book is less detailed than those of the following books? Usually it's the other way around. Anyway, the plot summary should be similarly lengthened.ZFT (talk) 07:30, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bitten (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]