Talk:Dale Mabry Highway

U.S. Roads: Florida C‑class Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations	Florida
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tampa Bay (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tampa Bay, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tampa BayWikipedia:WikiProject Tampa BayTemplate:WikiProject Tampa BayTampa Bay articles

Untitled

In actuality, Dale Mabry Hwy carries a total of four designations. From south to north; the road is signed as FL SR 573 (from MacDill AFB to Gandy Blvd), US 92/FL SR 600 (from Gandy Blvd to Hillsborough Ave), FL SR 580 (from Hillsborough Ave to Busch Blvd), and FL SR 597 (from Busch Blvd to US 41). I have added a list of the designations to the article. Wslupecki 19:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Because of the multiple designations that Dale Mabry Highway carries, I have relocated the SR-597 shield to the "Designations" section and added the other respective shields to the section as well. Wslupecki 02:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Merging State Road 573 (Florida) with this article

I think this proposed merger makes a lot of sense, since that FL-573 is part of Dale Mabry Hwy and that the article would not be able to be expanded enough to be a stand-alone article. Wslupecki 12:09, 19 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

New York State Thruway-style infobox?

Has anybody here seen the infobox for the New York State Thruway? It has multiple shields in the top. Perhaps something like this would be good for Dale Mabry as well. Just a thought. DanTD 23:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consider it done. - Aerobird 01:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Darn those .svg's

I saw you resized the signs, and I cleared my cache, cookies, and everything else I could think of, and yet those you resized still aren't appearing, TMF. I have no idea why, but I'm going to try to resize them, just until we can get them right once and for all. Any qualms? Eagles Fan In Tampa (formerly Jimbo) 23:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All five appear for me. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 23:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No idea, then. This is ridiculous; why will they show on some people's comps and not others? Something smells fishy to me, and it's not the Bay... ;-) Eagles Fan In Tampa (formerly Jimbo) 23:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last Change

As you may have noticed, I have added some insight into each major section of Dale Mabry Hwy (listed under the "designations" section. However, this list will need substantial updating as I do not know the scene on Dale Mabry through Carrollwood, since I do not visit the Carrollwood area often. I also added info and a reference regarding the former Jai Alai fronton in South Tampa, as it was a prominent facility in the area for years. However, I also forgot to mention that I got rid of the "Junctions with other major roads" section, as it is no longer needed due to the new infobox, which lists more major junctions than just the old list alone. Wslupecki 14:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Physical shape

Maybe I should include a section on how terrible the physical shape of Dale Mabry Hwy. is in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.180.27.240 (talk) 03:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a resurfacing project going on with the southernmost leg Wslupecki (talk) 16:58, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dale Mabry Highway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140306153400/http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/Straight-linesOnlineGIS/ to http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/Straight-linesOnlineGIS/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]