This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 13:51, 14 February 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject New Jersey}}, {{WikiProject Protected areas}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 13:51, 14 February 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject New Jersey}}, {{WikiProject Protected areas}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
The "Provisions of the law" section content "The New Jersey law shifted control of the regulation of waterways from the federal to the state government." (that is not sourced), may be confusing. State regulations are important (maybe more so since the release of headlines "E.P.A. Blocks Obama-Era Clean Water Rule") for palustrine wetlands. "Note": there are exceptions, 1)- Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission (New Jersey Meadowlands Commission) and the New Jersey Pinelands Commission.
The "Freshwater Wetlands Protection Act" extends protection, beforehand provided only to coastal wetlands, to inland waterways and wetlands.
I think the NJ FWPA "extends" protection but "shifted control of the regulation" may not be accurate, again lacking sourcing. Otr500 (talk) 19:25, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]