Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Luna (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Luna

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No consensus at last AfD, low participation. It is hard to read through the fact that this is written by a nearly-WP:SPA in a promotional way, but it doesn't appear that there are the sources available online to establish he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so I really hope we can now find a consensus, either way. Boleyn (talk) 18:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question: There are a number of references in the article, and in the last AfD, Jfire offered several more: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Boleyn, why do you feel that these sources don't add up to notability? Toughpigs (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't find any mentions of this person from Atlanta, multiple Gsearch hits on a person in the LA area that lost their son. Delete for not meeting notability requirements. The one source used calling him "controversial" is not the best, but it's about all we have. Oaktree b (talk) 21:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Oaktree b, that comment and vote makes no sense, as there are dozens of articles on Luna from Atlanta, and there were six already in the wiki article even when it got AFDed. Persingo (talk) 01:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- same as I voted in the prior AfD. There's enough sustained coverage in Atlanta-area papers to satisfy WP:GNG. See the newspaper coverage above. Jfire (talk) 21:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Targeted keyword searches yield abundant significant coverage in reliable sources. Just searching with the added keyword "Atlanta", I find dozens of good results, for example: [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. Persingo (talk) 09:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sources identified here and in the last AfD. Toughpigs (talk) 01:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would go along with a keep per WP:HEY, if and only if the citations and sources found were added to the article, with some content for context. Bearian (talk) 16:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.