Jump to content

Talk:Vote Leave

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by BattyBot (talk | contribs) at 03:25, 25 February 2024 (top: Fixed/removed unknown WikiProject parameter(s) and general fixes per WP:Talk page layout). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Contact information for this organisation

[edit]

This organisation doesn't seem to publish a phone number, but the whois of voteleavetakecontrol.org (where voteleave.uk redirects to) has the correct telephone number for them. In the UK it is 02079525454, outside +442079525454. I'm not sure if this should be on WP or where on the page, in the box on the top right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.96.23.130 (talk) 19:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relationships with other groups: charities

[edit]

This section includes a quote from Emma Reynolds's letter to the Charities Commission. The quote however is missing an apostrophe after "charities", which makes a nonsense of the meaning. Please can an authorised Wikipedia editor make the necessary amendment? The quotation in full should be:

"Pert may be in breach of charities’ legally binding commitments to preserve their independence, specifically regarding political activity and the delivery of charitable objectives."198.8.160.26 (talk) 13:46, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claims of effects of leaving the EU

[edit]

Perhaps it would be useful to have a list of the major claims made by the organisation during the campaign? --John Cummings (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Belated agreement John. I intend to add a picture showing their famous claim that the NHS could benefit by £350m a week. JRPG (talk) 20:45, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vote Leave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Handling of the breaches of the law

[edit]

The lead section has WP:NPOV issues. The top section is bloated and could do with trimming considerably. The long list of MPs is bloated and should be in the body of the article.

The final two paragraphs are problematic. The final paragraph mispresents the high court comments on the Electoral Commission. They did not undermine the findings against the Vote Leave - they disregarded the advice of the EC, and would have broken the law as stated in the advice that they were given.

The same matter is buried in the post referendum section of the Criticisms section. The law breaking is significant enough to have a subsection that would appear in the article table of contents.

Jonknight73 (talk) 08:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]