User talk:Joaquin89uy

Archives

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of an article on Wikipedia

Hello!

I really like the articles you create, publish or edit on Wikipedia. I’m not a Wikipedia specialist, so I would like to collaborate with a professional who has experience in this field. I would like to publish an article about Oskar Hartmann, entrepreneur, business angel and international investor, on the German or English version of Wikipedia.

I see it as a text about his professional career, investments and philosophy of life. Not PR or advertising articles. My name is Emma Rogers

Let me know if you are interested in describing Hartmann's biography as an author, please. I can give you more information RogEmma (talk) 08:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

China Jialing moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, China Jialing, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 07:27, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

Yamla (talk) 12:40, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joaquin89uy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not a sockpuppet lol. Don't even know what else to add, tbh. I don't know who blocked me or why or any of you people mentioned here. Joaquin89uy (talk) 15:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A simple denial is insufficient, as every sock puppet denies being one, since that is the whole point. 331dot (talk) 21:43, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot (talk) 21:43, 8 March 2024 (UTC)}} What do I have to do to prove my point?? And who called me out as a sockpuppet?? This is ridiculous. Like, shouldn't I get a warning first, at least?? Plus, I have a clean record, and plenty of clean contributions that you can easily check out, etc. Today I went around, trying to get to the bottom of this, and all I found was a comment from Yamla, on Cococ2001's talk page, saying: "Simple denial is insufficient. Additionally, Confirmed to Onesgje9g334 and Joaquin89uy, which I will go and block immediately.". What does that last sentence even mean? "Confirmed to" and then my name?? But confirmed to what? By whom? - Joaquin89uy (talk) 22:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Joaquin89uy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What do I have to do to prove my point?? And who called me out as a sockpuppet??

This is ridiculous. Like, shouldn't I get a warning first, at least?? Plus, I have a clean record, and plenty of clean contributions that you can easily check out, etc. Today I went around, trying to get to the bottom of this, and all I found was a comment from Yamla, on Cococ2001's talk page, saying: "Simple denial is insufficient. Additionally, Confirmed to Onesgje9g334 and Joaquin89uy, which I will go and block immediately.".

What does that last sentence even mean? "Confirmed to" and then my name?? But confirmed to what? By whom? - Joaquin89uy (talk) 05:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=What do I have to do to prove my point?? And who called me out as a sockpuppet?? 
This is ridiculous. Like, shouldn't I get a warning first, at least?? Plus, I have a clean record, and plenty of clean contributions that you can easily check out, etc. 
Today I went around, trying to get to the bottom of this, and all I found was a [[User_talk:Cococ2001#Blocked_as_a_sockpuppet|comment]] from Yamla, on Cococ2001's talk page, saying: "Simple denial is insufficient. Additionally,  '''Confirmed to Onesgje9g334 and Joaquin89uy, which I will go and block immediately."'''. 
What does that last sentence even mean? "Confirmed to" and then my name?? But confirmed to what? By whom? -  [[User:Joaquin89uy|Joaquin89uy]] ([[User talk:Joaquin89uy#top|talk]]) 05:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=What do I have to do to prove my point?? And who called me out as a sockpuppet?? 
This is ridiculous. Like, shouldn't I get a warning first, at least?? Plus, I have a clean record, and plenty of clean contributions that you can easily check out, etc. 
Today I went around, trying to get to the bottom of this, and all I found was a [[User_talk:Cococ2001#Blocked_as_a_sockpuppet|comment]] from Yamla, on Cococ2001's talk page, saying: "Simple denial is insufficient. Additionally,  '''Confirmed to Onesgje9g334 and Joaquin89uy, which I will go and block immediately."'''. 
What does that last sentence even mean? "Confirmed to" and then my name?? But confirmed to what? By whom? -  [[User:Joaquin89uy|Joaquin89uy]] ([[User talk:Joaquin89uy#top|talk]]) 05:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=What do I have to do to prove my point?? And who called me out as a sockpuppet?? 
This is ridiculous. Like, shouldn't I get a warning first, at least?? Plus, I have a clean record, and plenty of clean contributions that you can easily check out, etc. 
Today I went around, trying to get to the bottom of this, and all I found was a [[User_talk:Cococ2001#Blocked_as_a_sockpuppet|comment]] from Yamla, on Cococ2001's talk page, saying: "Simple denial is insufficient. Additionally,  '''Confirmed to Onesgje9g334 and Joaquin89uy, which I will go and block immediately."'''. 
What does that last sentence even mean? "Confirmed to" and then my name?? But confirmed to what? By whom? -  [[User:Joaquin89uy|Joaquin89uy]] ([[User talk:Joaquin89uy#top|talk]]) 05:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}