Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valor Security Services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valor Security Services

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NCORP. My BEFORE search showed lots of ROUTINE listings like OSHA, NRLB, etc. I found one brief news mention but not enough for notability. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Georgia (U.S. state). Chris Troutman (talk) 19:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The company was merged into Universal Protection Service in Feb 2015 [1], which itself is now subsumed in Allied Universal. Valor is not mentioned in these firms' histories, making redirect as an ATD remote. AllyD (talk) 17:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Having VPNed to access the news item mentioned by the nominator, I agree that this one incident does not contribute to the employing company's notability here, and searches are not finding better. A company previously going about its business but nothing indicates that it attained notability. AllyD (talk) 12:58, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.