Jump to content

User talk:DatBot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tim Pierce (talk | contribs) at 17:02, 20 March 2024 (→possible exclusion for File:Three Little Pigs - Fuller Brush Man 1933 and 1948.png?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Vladosinos

099 37.252.83.16 (talk) 15:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

37.33.37375.94 37.252.83.16 (talk) 15:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bot appears to have broken its own page

I can't explain this edit, which removed a necessary closing brace. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Resizing of non-free

Just my two cents, but this bot makes comparison pictures like [1] practically and functionally worthless. Might as well just delete at that point. Haruyasha (talk) 22:57, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help fixing image

Resolved

Anyone able to fix File:Goddess of Commerce, Tacoma, Washington.jpg? ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore File:My Observations During the Explosion at Trinity on July 16, 1945 - E. Fermi.jpg for legibility

Dear DatBot,

Size reduction of this report image makes it illegible. The image supports and illustrates the article Trinity_(nuclear_test)#Energy_measurements where this unclassified eyewitness report by famous physicist Enrico Fermi already was quoted long before

About 40 seconds after the explosion the air blast reached me....would be produced by ten thousand tons of T.N.T.

Readers can verify the whole report by themselves if the original image is retained. So

  • Could you please restore this image to legible size? Then it makes more sense as proof and illustration.

Thank you, the uploader of this report image, Hansmuller (talk) 07:26, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

Resolved

Is anyone able to fix File:Bust of Jean Baptiste Point du Sable, Chicago.jpg? ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:03, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Can you fix the problem? File:SaptaSaagaradaache.jpg please fix it. ᵃʳᵘⁿ (talk) 06:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fix request

Resolved

Anyone able to fix File:Children's Fountain, Chicago.jpg? ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another fix request

Resolved

Anyone able to fix File:Chevron sculpture, Chicago.jpg, please? ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer: I'm not sure what it is with your phone that sticks the orientation tag, but this should be fixed from now on. DatGuyTalkContribs 01:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:41, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undid transparent.

Could you please delete the older version of the image transparent with your bot? Because I've undone this transparent image logo Vietnamese cite as they are new uploads.

Bonthefox3 (talk) 05:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Give permission to use in other languages in wiki

please ArmenAir (talk) 10:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Britannia_Yacht_Club,_Ottawa_and_its_main_and_inner_harbours_in_2022.jpg

On January 3, 2024, Datbot uploaded a reduced-size version of the image. I am requesting that the previous version of the labelled file be permanently reinstated on the basis that the extensive labelling on this image already serves as a watermark, i.e. the labelling already prevents use of the unlabelled image because the labelling is permanent and cannot be removed according to the following statement extracted from Apple Support ( https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/preview/prvw1501/mac ): "Note: If you annotate an image file, you can’t edit, move, or delete the annotations after you save the image.”

Additionally, I had already reduced the size of the original Google Maps’ screenshot from 5.7 MB to 1.87 MB, a reduction of about one third.

Fulfilling this request will help make “Wikipedia the best that it can be”. Robert Neustadter (talk) 19:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, in the reduced-size image, Google's credits on the bottom of the Google Map image are illegible. Legible credits are mandatory (see https://about.google/brand-resource-center/products-and-services/geo-guidelines/#required-attribution ) in order to credit Google and the many third-party data providers that contributed to this image. Robert Neustadter (talk) 20:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong on Wikipedia. 92.40.192.162 (talk) 17:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resize makes it larger!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Acrobat_(novel).jpeg 265 × 425 (22 KB) gets resized to 249 × 400 (77 KB). How does resizing it make it take up more space? Dream Focus 23:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dream Focus Looks like it's using the same JPEG quality for all files, without looking the original quality. For example, if you exported it with the quality of 20%, it can be using 50% so the space is wasting for no reason. And that shows robots cannot do tasks as good as humans. I think bots should not go into file processes unless they have a artificial intelligence engine, because for example this bot will not downgrade the quality enough for a very basic file while it will downgrade the quality too very much for very detailed images for example a screenshot of a computer program. RuzDD (talk) 13:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC).[reply]

File:World of Horror screenshot.jpg

I recently uploaded File:World of Horror screenshot.jpg and didn't resize it, but the DatBot autoresize ended up butchering/compressing much of the legibility of the interface due to the way the game is laid out surrounded by borders along with the small icons, so I ended up resizing it myself in a slightly different way that produced a sharper result with a slightly larger resolution (by which I mean, only 450 × 253 compared to 421 × 237), which ironically produced a smaller filesize, only for the bot to "fix" that by shrinking it down and re-obscuring the image, which makes it significantly blurier in addition to being smaller. Totalibe (talk) 19:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Totalibe That's a huge example of this fact: robots cannot do tasks as good as humans. RuzDD (talk) 13:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Iostn correct pinging. RuzDD (talk) 13:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

,jnbftjnhh

vgugderzt7 89.247.166.182 (talk) 13:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image request

Could you please resize Derek Chisora’s new image? If possible to 570 × 713 (585 KB)? Thank you. LRQ 98 (talk) 10:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I use your non-free files for userboxes?

I've created an userbox template TGGC member and used with one of your (non-)free images, Turkish GGC emblem. Is it usable? Kys5g (talk) 07:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Эмхия

Щ 94.233.250.40 (talk) 18:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible exclusion for File:Three Little Pigs - Fuller Brush Man 1933 and 1948.png?

I have uploaded File:Three Little Pigs - Fuller Brush Man 1933 and 1948.png to illustrate the difference between the original 1933 release and the modified 1948 release. I was careful to size this image so that neither frame exceeds 320x240 pixels; however, because there are two frames in it, the total image size is approximately 650 pixels wide and is slightly more than 0.1 megapixels. I think that this should suffice to meet the non-free media guidelines, but DatBot keeps resizing it. Is it possible to exclude this file from DatBot? —Tim Pierce (talk) 17:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DatBot&oldid=1214705070"