Talk:Laser scanning at Stonehenge
This article was nominated for deletion on 190106. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012 publication of 2011 laser scan report
[edit]The report on the complete laser scan can be found here: http://services.english-heritage.org.uk/ResearchReportsPdfs/032_2012web.pdf
Perhaps a good basis to summarise the technical approaches used in scanning Stonehenge, linking out to the main article on the recent discoveries? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.167.178.201 (talk) 09:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
merge
[edit]I copied this out of the Stonehenge article as it was getting too big - there is an awful lot to write about the place. [{Stonehenge]] is still far oversize and merging it back in would just bulk out that page all over again. adamsan 20:53, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
Moving
[edit]This page is very short, It could become a subsection of 3d scanner page where is a list of uses of 3d scanning technologies for Cultural heritage.ALoopingIcon 09:31, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Laser scanning at Stonehenge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110317214223/http://www.stonehengelaserscan.org:80/press.html to http://www.stonehengelaserscan.org/press.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110517041359/http://www.english-heritage.org.uk:80/about/news/stonehenge-in-high-definition/ to http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/about/news/stonehenge-in-high-definition/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Laser scanning at Stonehenge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051225111736/http://www.stonehengelaserscan.org/ to http://www.stonehengelaserscan.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.161.100.97 (talk) 10:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 17 December 2017 (UTC)