Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 April 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Useddenim (talk | contribs) at 05:10, 28 April 2024 (→‎Template:Skytrain MIA: keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

< April 24
April 26 >

April 25

Template:Law & Order video games

Entirely contained within Template:Law & Order franchise. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KDE navigation templates

These navigation templates contain only a handful of links, some to either non-notable red-links or redirects back to the topic article. Any actually useful links could be put in Template:KDE instead (which needs its own cleaning up).

(created this nom for Template:Kdepim, but edited it for other redundant KDE-related templates)

--TappyTurtle [talk | contribs] 17:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first two seem to have enough blue, non redirect, links to support a navigation template. Gonnym (talk) 19:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frecciabianca s-line templates

Propose merging Template:S-line/IT-Eurostar left/Frecciabianca and Template:S-line/IT-Eurostar right/Frecciabianca with Module:Adjacent stations/Trenitalia. Currently this line is handled by both the old s-line system and the module. The ~30 s-line usages should be converted to use the newer Adjacent stations module system. --Gonnym (talk) 15:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I agree, but any conversion should assume that the existing s-line templates are outdated and don't represent existing services. Unless whomever is handling the conversion is updating the article from reliable sources, then the existing templates should simply be removed. Mackensen (talk) 17:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mackensen is that correct for the remaining s-line templates or only these? Gonnym (talk) 17:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Gonnym Only these. See the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Italy#Routes in railway station articles. The confidence level for Italian articles is low. I'll take a stab. Mackensen (talk) 17:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Skytrain MIA

This template has entirely redundant information copied from Template:Miami International Airport, which provides better context for this people mover within the airport as a whole. The Miami International Airport template is also the route diagram template (RDT) used in the articles for the airport's other two people mover systems. Jackdude101 talk cont 14:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep – This template serves as a simple schematic for the Skytrain, and additionally shows pedestrian connections for 2 of the 4 stations (which are not present in the other template). The Skytrain article should have a route map template with only its route in the infobox. The two other APMs at the airport are not relevant for inclusion because the three systems function independently. (They are briefly mentioned in the article's prose, but do not need to be present in the infobox.) The main template may be useful in the article for Miami International Airport, but I don't think it belongs in the Skytrain article's infobox.
–Dream out loud (talk) 19:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 12:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2024_April_25&oldid=1221148009"