Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Air Lines Flight 520

Delta Air Lines Flight 520

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The definition of WP:NOTNEWS. Losing an inflatable slide mid-flight isn't something that's gonna get sustained coverage, and I know (not "I don't think", I know) it's gonna fail the ten-year test. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 04:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why not request speed delete if you mr. einstein think you know (not "i don't think", i know) that this will 100% fail that nonsense test? like those random plane crash articles from the 90's that would definitely fail that 10 year test?? GeekyAviation (talk) 05:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:LASTING. The aircraft involved is 33 years old, this isn’t a brand new aircraft that was recently delivered. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 05:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No fatalities or serious injuries, only minor damage to the airframe, and unlikely to result in changes to procedures, regulations or processes affecting airports, airlines or the aircraft industry. I agree that this is unlikely to pass WP:10YT. Maybe this incident will maintain some traction with sensationalist sources due to a Boeing aircraft being involved, but I fully expect all reliable sources to stop covering this story long before it would be considered lasting coverage. - ZLEA _T\^C 05:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - agree with everything above. If this does attract continued coverage (as unlikely as that seems) then it can be resurrected.--Gronk Oz (talk) 09:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Incident seems unnotable. No fatalities, no injuries, just like any other minor incident. Also WP:NOTNEWS CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 13:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and New York.
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete run-of-the-mill incident, per WP:NOTNEWS. Rosbif73 (talk) 16:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i remember when you called LATAM Airlines Flight 800 a non notable incident aswell, of course you call this a run-of-the-mill incident GeekyAviation (talk) 02:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTNEWS Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

seems like you are going along with everyone else and seem to not know anything about aviation, funny GeekyAviation (talk) 02:51, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments are becoming disruptive. If you have legitimate rebuttals to specific arguments, then you can voice them here. Otherwise, please let this discussion run its course. - ZLEA _T\^C 03:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"then you can voice them here." thats literally what im doing GeekyAviation (talk) 03:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should actually state what’s wrong with their statements while providing clear reasons why you don’t agree whilst being respectful instead of criticizing them just because you have a different opinion. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 03:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"criticizing" there is no way you are real dude, how in the world is that criticizing. wikipedia is really a website filled with soft people GeekyAviation (talk) 03:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do i look like im deleting peoples votes and not letting the discussion run? nope GeekyAviation (talk) 03:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]