Talk:Tliltocatl vagans

El Salvador Low‑importance

	El Salvador portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject El Salvador, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of El Salvador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.El SalvadorWikipedia:WikiProject El SalvadorTemplate:WikiProject El SalvadorEl Salvador articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spiders Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spiders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spiders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpidersWikipedia:WikiProject SpidersTemplate:WikiProject SpidersSpiders articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Central America

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Central America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America articles

Untitled

Start of Talk:

Finally a "Correct" rating

Finally a correct rating that doesn't have to address length of article. I am a little critical of all the 'experts' who 'own' wikipedia. An example, the huge article on "Evolution" starts in the first sentence addressing: "Biological evolution". Eventually someone will hold their feet to the fire and rename It: "Evolution of Life", or "Biological evolution", Since there are so many other varieties of "Evolution". (Plus their ignoring Earth evolution by focussing on the (unnamed) "Biological evolution"). Anyhow... its nice to see a B rating on a shorter–type article. --from the SonoranDesert of Arizona- ..Mmcannis 02:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better Image

File:Brachypelma vagans dsc 5487.jpg

I think my picture would look better in the article, but I didn't want to offend anyone, so I'm posting it here. ;-) It was taken in Mexico in 2006. --Janjan2 11:02, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I made a gallery and uploaded a picture of a juvenile as well. Didn't remove anything from the article Privateiron (talk) 12:17, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In captivity section

Better than the normal "pet" section, but poorly referenced (ie not at all) and still hovering on the edge of a care sheet. Ill modify in the next few days with some luck Man Over-bored (talk) 14:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geography

The article stated "Brachypelma vagans is a species of tarantula known commonly as the Mexican red rump or Mexican black velvet. It ranges predominantly in Mexico, but can be found as far south as Belize, Yucatan, El Salvador, and Guatemala. " But The Yucatan Peninsula is part of Mexico. Soparamens (talk) 17:13, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brachypelma vagans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060813113848/http://www.brachypelmas.co.uk/ to http://www.brachypelmas.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]