Talk:Executor (Star Wars)
Appearance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by TAnthony (talk | contribs) at 03:37, 8 May 2024 (→top: Add WP banner(s) - Fictional element redirects). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
I recall seeing the super star destroyer colliding with a planetoid, not the "incomplete second Death Star" as the History section mentions. I don't know if it was Endor, or any of the moons (except 2nd, of course) of Endor. So I will leave the edit to someone to has factual knowledge to update the page. (This is referenceing 31 December 2005 revision.)
Are we sure that the rebel crashing his Awing into the bridge was really a kamikazi attempt? It seems to me he had lost control of his ship due to heavy damage and the colision was accidental
That's how it always looked to me too. But never underestimate the Power of the Marysue in the SWU. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_minor_Star_Wars_Rebel_characters#Crynyd.2C_Arvel Ribonucleic 23:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is it really plausible that the crew was 2.6 million? This would be twice the crew of the Death Star which is hundreds of times bigger. Perhaps the 2.6 million includes families of crew members? --Funkmaster 801 01:07, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also worth pointing out that several of the older sources say that the Executor was heavily automated and had ahuge complement of droids. Unlike other older information, there is np reason to think that is unreiable. Consequently even a 19 km Executor might have a much smaller crew than the 3.3 million currently being claimed. I always thought it wouldn't be bigger than half a million anyway: the Eclipse, a similar sized vessel, only had a crew of 750,000. SMegatron 13:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
since this seems to be such a hotly contested difference, could someone please explain the distinction between a star dreadnaught and a star destroyer? --Funkmaster 801 06:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
According to Saxton's site at least, a destroyer is a light combatant suitable for escort and chasing down smaller ships. A dreadnaught is a much larger heavy combatant with powerful guns and armour suitable for heavy engagements. Hope that helps. SMegatron 13:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why does it say that Executor is a name that kenner toys didn't want because it was too "mature." It's Executor, not Executioner. --Pollard666 04:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the information on this page is in-universe plot summary. I'd suggest this article redirect to Super Star Destroyer#Executor, which trims the plot and has supporting citations. --EEMeltonIV 04:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The chart and the article contradict each other concerning the tie fighter number.