Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chamak Damak
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chamak Damak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 15:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I couldn't even find ROTM coverage in RS, much less sig/in-depth coverage as required by GNG and it clearly fails WP:NTV also. Nominator beat me to AfD'd this one. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete - Clearly fails WP: Notability (television) and WP:GNG. Doesn't provide substantial material to be notable on Google search as well. Sameeerrr (talk) 15:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)striking vote of confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.