Talk:Reliability of Wikipedia
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
A summary of this article appears in Wikipedia. |
To-do list for Reliability of Wikipedia:
Priority 4
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
This is not the page to discuss whether a source in an article is reliable. If you want to do that, go to WP:RSN or the talk page of the article in question. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This topic has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
|
||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
More information to possibly add in
I made a draft about this same topic (yet it cannot become an article since this one exists,) but I figured I would post it here if anyone wants to look at it and possibly add the information into this article, since my draft is a lost cause at this point. I just want to contribute into this article, since my own cannot be published. It has some pretty important points, in my opinion.
~
Draft:Wikipedia: a surprisingly reliable site by AriLovesTacos (talk) 04:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Ari. I see the above draft has been moved to User:AriLovesTacos/Wikipedia: a surprisingly reliable site. Feel free to be bold and update any article you think you can improve. That's how Wikipedia was written. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 03:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
113.160.204.217 (talk) 01:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Please be more specific about what you would like us to change. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 03:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)