Jump to content

User talk:GokulChristo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Timtrent (talk | contribs) at 17:30, 3 June 2024 (Notification: I've commented on your Articles for Creation submission (AFCH)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

June 2024

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. GoldRomean (talk) 15:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the current edit regarding 207 Field Regiment is legit. The reason being i myself am the originator of information being me belonging to that org. GokulChristo (talk) 15:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon

Hello GokulChristo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:GokulChristo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=GokulChristo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 207 Field Regiment (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, GokulChristo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 207 Field Regiment (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Waqar💬 17:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 207 Field Regiment (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Waqar💬 17:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 207 Field Regiment (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Waqar💬 17:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:207 Field Regiment has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:207 Field Regiment. Thanks! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]