Talk:Delusion

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Delusion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1: 120 days

Psychology High‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Psychiatry Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force.

Disability

Delusion is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Delusion.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Types of delusions are misleading

I been into page 89 of DSM V journal, the one from 2013. Not sure where these categories is coming from. They actually have a long list of types, in diagnose F22.

Confusing Formatting

The formatting on the types of delusions seems to split between two different styles: listing general descriptions of delusions and giving specific insight into delusions. I am new to Wikipedia editing, so I am avoiding changing anything that requires a higher levels of understanding to inform the general public. However, if anyone of better qualification sees this, I would recommend deleting the general listings and instead furthering the number of delusions with in-depth research. LightningKing72 (talk) 19:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am also confused about types of delusions, that is mentioned here. When I go into the references, it says something else; it says what is mentioned in DSM V instead, in diagnose F22 2001:2020:305:A8BC:51DF:4A79:4F88:845F (talk) 07:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Transgender

The listed descriptive characteristics of "Delusion" might well reasonably apply to the phenomenon of people experiencing transgender ideation or tendencies. Is there any non-political reason these two conditions should not be linked for cross-reference? Yes, it's a third-rail concept, but intellectual honesty often flies in the face of personal comfort. 71.197.121.170 (talk) 23:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is. We have no reliable sources connecting the two. Read WP:OR and do not try to insert your own opinions into Wikipedia articles. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and before you ask: Right-wing wackjobs such as Republican politicians and the Murdoch Empire do not count as reliable sources. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Graeber

the Criticism section sites critiques from David Graeber and gives his book Bullshit Jobs as a source but delusions are never mentioned in that nor is it even related to the topic of the book. I couldn't find any source of him talking about this topic so I replaced the citation with a [citation needed]. If a citation can't be found I recommend the paragraph be replaced by some else's critiques oh how delusions are understood. I can recommend Mircea Eliade, R. D. Laing, and/or Michel Foucault. LJFIN2 (talk) 11:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]