Talk:Gigarcanum

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gigarcanum article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Gigarcanum is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cryptozoology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to improve coverage of the pseudoscience and subculture of cryptozoology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CryptozoologyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptozoologyTemplate:WikiProject CryptozoologyCryptids articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Extinction Low‑importance

	This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Photo request

The only known specimen of this extinct New Zealand reptile is held in the Marseilles Natural History Museum. All images of it that I've been able to track down appear to be protected by copyright. Ambrosia10 (talk) 00:07, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could we email the museum and ask for a picture to use?--Mr Fink (talk) 01:12, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Largest?

According to the article about the Rodriguez Island Giant Day Gecko, Phelsuma gigas, that one would be the largest gecko, as it is 40 centimeters long.--Mr Fink (talk) 05:24, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I reverted this: I don't see any evidence that the 400 mil number is supposed to refer to snout to vent length, in fact the wikipedia page says 'overall' (and it's not cited either). If it is referring to overall length, then it's a fair bit smaller than this species at 600 mil. This change brings it back in line with all the citations on the page, which not only say that this is the largest gecko, but 'by far' the largest. I do note that you have a source for the other one being the largest gecko, but, as it's from a full century before the rediscovery and description of this one, I don't see that it's terribly relevant.115.188.170.39 (talk) 01:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kawekaweau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130420190127/http://www.bio.ucalgary.ca/contact/faculty/pdf/russell/38.pdf to http://www.bio.ucalgary.ca/contact/faculty/pdf/russell/38.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inadequate article title

It seems the name "kawekaweau" has only speculatively been associated with this species, since there is no agreement the specimen came form New Zealand, so it is not appropriate to have that as article title. It should be moved to one of the other common names or the scientific name. There is a summary of the situation here:[1] FunkMonk (talk) 15:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think the scientific name is a conservative and quite viable approach. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 06:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, seems I'll have to start a formal move-request, since I can't do the move myself... FunkMonk (talk) 06:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New article sheds light on origins of specimen

DNA shows this gecko is part of New Caledonia gecko radiation see Heinicke, M.P., Nielsen, S.V., Bauer, A.M. et al. Reappraising the evolutionary history of the largest known gecko, the presumably extinct Hoplodactylus delcourti, via high-throughput sequencing of archival DNA. Sci Rep 13, 9141 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35210-8 Ambrosia10 (talk) 21:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]