Talk:Blackpool North and Cleveleys (UK Parliament constituency)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is the Northern Party a socialist or conservative party?
[edit]There is no clear statement of the political views of this party. On the article for it, it says there is one former conservative MP. However there is no indication of where the new party stands on political matters. An encyclopaedia article ought not be so vague.Senotshtooms (talk) 14:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Senotshtooms: This page is not for stating political views. We give the name of the candidate and their party, either of which may be linked, and that's all, because Wikipedia is not a place to hold an election campaign. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:29, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Blackpool North and Cleveleys (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Elections graph is misleading
[edit]The election graph is a line chart with years along the bottom. However the time axis is not consistent and gives the same amount of space for each election rather than year.
The current chart gives a misleading impression of how long the conservatives have held the seat, since there have been more elections per year since they have held the seat.
Either a bar chart should be used instead with a bar per election, or points on the line chart should be spaced appropriately based on the year they occured. Garemoko (talk) 07:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Updates subject to boundary changes and 2024 general election
[edit]This article needs changes due to it being abolished following the 2024 election. YoshiDoshi (talk) 07:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Stub-Class Lancashire and Cumbria articles
- High-importance Lancashire and Cumbria articles
- WikiProject UK Parliamentary Constituencies articles
- Stub-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles