User talk:BeauSuzanne

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	This is to give you well-deserved credit for your amazing contributions in the fields of Pakistani Arts and Entertainment especially in Films and Music Hope you can continue doing this. Cheers.... Ngrewal1 (talk) 16:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks(BeauSuzanne (talk) 16:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Safia Khairi (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

But I don't see any improvement since this bio moved to draft NS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Safia Khairi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BeauSuzanne! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @BeauSuzanne this is me Inayat Khan a pakistani actor my Article or (page) Inayat Khan (actor) has been deleted from wikipedia can you please recover it? You can also send me a message on my official verified Instagram account @inayatkhanofficial Inayatkhanactor (talk) 12:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Yes it is deleted but you can find it in the urdu wikipedia. Write the name in urdu and you will see the link. It will be there and you can translated into english.(14:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC))

Yasmeen Tahir moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Yasmeen Tahir. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you won't stop adding WP:OR using fictitious references to BLPs despite previous warnings? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saqib. I haven't used fictitious references and now I am very careful with sources. These sources are good. I did all checking and made sure it's good.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 08:53, 5 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Please be WP:HONEST. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:25, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saqib. I am honest with you. But I will do some more research.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 16:53, 5 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]

I strongly advise you against creating articles in the main NS. I'm sure you've been advised on this before, but it seems you're ignoring that advice. If you believe this BLP doesn't contain WP:OR and fictitious references, why not take the AFC route and submit it for review, as suggested here. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:30, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am going submit it for review. I am only looking for some sources. And yes i remember you told me to not make articles on mainspace.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 17:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]

So, are you gonna try to avoid creating articles in the main NS next time OR will you just go ahead and do it again? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will again start with making it in draft space.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 18:41, 5 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]

You appear determined to continue adding WP:OR to BLPs despite the warnings. Right? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello BeauSuzanne. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Yasmeen Tahir, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:BeauSuzanne. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=BeauSuzanne|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saqib. I don't work for anyone. I am simply contributing to Wikipedia that's all. I don't have any connection and I am not a paid contributior. I have said it before I am simply contributing to wikipedia.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 17:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]
- I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt, but each time you create a new article, you just manage to raise my eyebrows once more. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - I understand. But I don't work for anyone.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 18:41, 5 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as List of Hell Girl characters. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will be carefull about it and make sure it's rightly done.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 07:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fareeda Shabbir, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 17:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. No worries. It's her recent dramas on ary digital.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 18:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Yasmeen Tahir moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Yasmeen Tahir. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 13:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, inviting you to read the page talk page, where I've left a message for you, and the page history. Thank you.@Rydex64 -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 13:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yasmeen Tahir

The sources in the articles you wikilinked, Sona Chandi and Khuda Ki Basti (TV series), do not mention her name. You cannot add something that is not verifiable. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I did search various sources to support it but I could'nt find. Ok I won't add it.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 20:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:10, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 20:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Yasmeen Tahir.

BeauSuzanne if you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content you will be blocked. As you are aware right now there is an ANI discussion about just that with an active proposal to block you. If that is not enough to get your attention, I do not what what is. S0091 (talk) 19:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC) S0091 (talk) 19:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know. Its three of her dramas which I saw currently to comfirm everything. And I did search everything like magazine and source but could'nt find a source to add. Sorry about that.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 20:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]
What you know/see is irrelevant as that is orginal research and if that is all you have, the content cannot be included. Published reliable sources are a requirement, not an option. S0091 (talk) 20:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

' OKay.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 20:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]