Talk:Grey columns
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Student peer reviews
- Quality of the information: 2
Good time range of sources - Article size: 2
(15,334 bytes) - Readability: 1
More links would be helpful, some sentence structures could be improved for clarity but overall good " - References: 2
More citations in the Role in Pain System and Lateral Grey Column sections would be helpful. - Links: 2
Could add more but sufficient linking and a red link Haptic" and "nociceptive" can be linked. "Analgesics" can also be linked. - Responsive to Comments: 2
no comments so no need for response - Formatting: 2
Formatting is a little confusing more of an intro about the three separate types may help to orient the reader. Pictures/diagrams would be extremely helpful - Writing: 1
Capitalize Laminae in the sentence "laminae III and IV....". The article switches between the European spelling "grey" and the American spelling "gray". - Used Real Name: 2
- Is Outstanding in some way: 1
Good article but not outstanding
Total: 17/20
Jsiemer3 (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback Jessica. I standardized the page to only use one spelling of "grey". I will also add those links you suggested. Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Quality of Information: 2
- Article size: 2
- Readability: 1
Strong use of hyperlinks, but wording is sometimes confusing and article may not be understood completely by the average reader. - Refs: 2
- Links: 2
Strong use of links to other Wikipedia articles throughout. - Responsive to comments: 2
No comments - Formatting: 2
Good organization of sub-sections. - Writing: 2
Some awkward sentence structure, but overall the article is well written and consistent. - Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
- Outstanding?: 1
Only slightly over 15,000 Bytes and only obvious portions of the topic are discussed. Also, there are no figures or pictures to increase understanding.
Total: 18 out of 20
Ryandrsmith (talk) 15:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- I will work on restructuring some of the sentences. Thanks for the feedback. Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- I added a picture as you suggested. Thanks. Bsridhar6 (talk) 02:33, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Quality of Information: 2
- Article size: 2
- Readability: 2
I have had no particular problem with readability. - Refs: 2
- Links: 2
- Responsive to comments: 2
No comments so far - Formatting: 2
Well-organized (anterior vs posterior vs lateral) - Writing: 2
Consistent and writing style - Used real name: 2
- Outstanding?: 1
A lot of information covered, but depth seems lacking a little bit
Total: 19 out of 20
JinYongSim (talk) 17:45, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback.Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
My name is Balaji Sridhar and I have spent the past months working on a new, detailed gray column page which has just been added. Bsridhar6 (talk) 21:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Section headers
Students: please note that the headers (titles) of each section are incorrectly capitalized, per MOS:CAPS. Please fix it. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback and link to the MOS, Tryptofish. I changed the sections headers to sentence case as listed in the link you provided. Bsridhar6 (talk) 01:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Spinal cord horn
A small stub all of which covered in Grey column and in more detail Iztwoz (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Done
Proposed merge of Posterior grey column into Grey column
Much better coverage on target page Iztwoz (talk) 19:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC)