User talk:CattleGirl

My archives
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3

Welcome to my talk page!

• To leave a new message, click here. But first, please read my talk page guidelines below...

• If you are replying from another message, please put my message on this page as well using ctrl/c ctrl/v, and indent your messages using : (a colon). This makes conversations readable.
• Be civil- I will remove messages that are vandalism.
• I will respond to all messages on your talk page.
• PLEASE SIGN YOUR COMMENTS by putting ~~~~ after your post. I don't really want to be searching through the page history to find who posted the message!
• And a special thanks to Riana for some codes I found on her talk page, and also thanks to Erich and Editor at Large, who helped with the codes on her page. I have put these codes onto my own to make them look colourful! :)

Cheers- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!}

Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 13	26 March 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor: Tardiness, volunteers, RSS
Patrick and Wool resign in office shakeup	WikiWorld comic: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo"
News and notes: Board resolutions, milestones	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 13:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Hope all goes well

Thank you very much. I hope everything goes smoothly. =) Nishkid64 13:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Coaching

Sorry it took so long to get back to you! I've never really coached someone, but I'd be willing to give it a shot. Trouble is that I'm leaving for Paris very soon and will be away from Wikipedia for a couple of weeks. If you want to wait until after I get back (around 17 April), I'd be happy to help out. Cheers. -- Merope 15:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

That sounds great! Thanks for saying you'll coach me- I hope your trip goes well! Cheers- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 00:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

REMEwatcher

Hi, and welcome! What is it that you need helping with? CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 09:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I couldn't see anything on the screen - I didn't know I had to look at 'edit this page'. I was wondering if my username could be exchanged with the IP address on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:M1919A2.JPG&action=history

The reason I'd blanked the image is that the user concerned has been editing the Wiki by adding badly photoshopped images and passing them off as actual items. The next step in his spamming is posting the picture on sites and asking what anyone ele knows about it, eg:

http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/showthread.php?p=96514#post96514 http://www.ww2incolor.com/forum/showthread.php?p=96885#post96885

a) http://forums.impactguns.com/showthread.php?t=771 b) http://forums.impactguns.com/archive/index.php/t-754.html c) http://forums.3drealms.com/vb/showthread.php?t=23385&page=3 d) http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread221469/pg1 [linked from c) above, same user posting as 'Browno'] e) http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/archive/index.php/t-88791.html [linked from c) above, same user posting as 'Jabroni'] f) http://www.securityarms.com/forums/showthread.php?t=568 [linked from c) above same user posting as 'Grenadier Toebanger'] g) http://www.irandefence.net/archive/index.php/t-6696.html h) http://www.machinegunshoot.com/forums/archive/index.php?t-133.html

This came to the attention of a number of people on various military and firearms related forums where the user concerned had been spamming the sites with utter rubbish.

While this in itself is merely a purile act, it does make the Wiki unusable as a research tool. He has been using the sign-in names of various people on these sites to make the changes, which when they are accredited engineers, developers, etc throws their real work into a bad light.

Some of the names he has posted under include:

BashaBasher Bling-bling Browno Canashea Cutaway (Where he took the name of an established member of the Army Rumour Service) EX STAB (Not to be confused with EX_STAB, who is a real authority on the subject) Grenadier Toebanger Gutaway Jabroni Sniffle-snaffle Trambuan Waithbraite

The list is far from comprehensive it shows the lengths to hich he will go. There are various others that have I believe been blocked by the Wiki.

Other items he has posted here include 'hand held mini gun' and 'ripper gun'

I fully realise that this is an asset which may be accessed by anyone, but deliberate disinformation and spamming should be taken in hand rapidly.

REMEwatcher

I now also need to know how I blank my 'My Talk' page & kill the history there please.

I must apologise, my user name is WatcherREME rather tha REMEwatcher - please bear that in mind when replying to my question.

thaks, WatcherREME

Hello CattleGirl, I'm unsure of how to correspond on this system, but could you please advise me on the problem I posted earlier ?

Regards, WatcherREME

Hi, WatcherREME.

Firstly, I don't think your username and IP address can be exchanged- I'm pretty sure it has to remain as it is.

I've had a look at what you're saying- according to some of those forums the pictures where indeed badly photoshopped- but weaponry, and even images on Wikipedia aren't my areas of expertise!

As a user who's not really involved, I can't take much action on this, however I can recommend a number of pages to you that can help.

A question- when you say he's been using the sign in names of other people, do you mean on Wikipedia or on other websites? If it's on other websites you'll have to bring it up with the site moderator, but on Wikipedia you can read through Wikipedia:Sock puppetry and then, if you're convinced the user is a sockpuppet- someone who's been abusing multiple accounts- you can list them at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets.

I agree with you that insertion of misinformation should be dealt with rapidly, but as before, as I'm not really involved myself, probably the best thing you can do is list your "case", if you will, at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. This will be quickly attended to by an administrator.

As for deleting your talk page and talk page history, you should see Wikipedia:Right to vanish. Again, only an administrator can delete your talk page and history. Generally it's policy to keep talk pages on the wiki, but once again, you can see that page and see what can be done.

I hope that helped you, if not, please feel free to contact me again. CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 07:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Romney Sheep

Hello, thank you for replying to my post. As you see, I'm a novice with wikipedia. It looks as if you are right now the working editor of the Romney Sheep article. Probably I can figure out how to edit the page, but would vastly prefer to talk with you first or with others you work with.

Please read the long posting I did last week, in which I introduced myself. That one breaks off near the end, where I was saying that even though Romneys now comprise less than half of the NZ sheep population, that is ten times more than any other pure breed and should not be called a "significant" dropoff in interest. As I'm sure you know, NZ sheep growers are constantly innovating with crossbreeding and this habit (not confined to NZ) does seem to discount the value of pure breeds in a national industry. Only seems to. In fact the Coopworth was originally a Romney cross until it became a recognized breed. Let me know anything in that posting you don't agree with. If everything is OK with you, let me know that and I'll try to edit the piece or, if you wish, you can incorporate my suggestions in your rewrite.

How did I get to this? Sat down to write a 250 word history of the breed for an event to be help next year and thought I'd see what ever-helpful wikipedia had to say. Nice to talk with you thus. Now, I hope I can sign out properly. My email address, if I don't, is sqs1@columbia.edu Sawyer12477--Sawyer12477 12:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the late-ish reply.

I've read through what you've written on the Romney talk page and I must say I agree with most of it. One of the problems with the article is it's biased- I know some of the writers (aren't active on Wikipedia anymore) who admittedly wrote it focused on Australia, and now it's probably focused too much on the UK.

I'll reply to your message on the Romney talk page there.

You obviously (referring to comment on talk page again) know a fair bit about Romneys- please edit the page as you see fit. I too will be expanding it and correcting it- it needs it. If you want to talk about changes, feel free to contact me here or on the romney talk page.

Cheers- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 08:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Smile!

– Riana ^ऋ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Just ran across your page somehow, and was shocked at your layout! Then I remembered how you asked me if you could borrow it all those months ago... ^^ Hope you're doing good! – Riana ^ऋ 05:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

lol, thanks for the smile. I'd forgotten about that! Hey, a late congratulations on your RFA- you're already making a great admin. Cheers- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 10:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 14	2 April 2007	About the Signpost

Poll finds people think Wikipedia "somewhat reliable"	Wikipedia biographical errors attract more attention
Association of Members' Advocates nominated for deletion	Reference desk work leads to New York Times correction
WikiWorld comic: "Charles Lane"	News and notes: Alexa, Version 0.5, attribution poll
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, CattleGirl! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 17:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

User:Jmath666/Computational mathematics

Hi, thanks very much for watching out for vandalism. That was quick and it is very nice to see someone is doing that. In this case I put the {{delete}} myself but the login expired so it got logged under the IP. Jmath666 16:08, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, right. Sorry about that- I didn't want your page to be deleted without you knowing! Anyway, cheers- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 02:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

.....

Stop removing my comments.. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.99.58.198 (talk) 03:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC).

Romney sheep

Hello, I hope I remember how to sign this properly. I not, my e-mail address is sqs1@columbi.edu. Thank you for addressing my comments and thank you for agreeing with most of them. Let's work together to upgrade the article to GA status, whatever, that is. I'll start by getting a source about the role of Romneys in the high-end carpeting industry. I don't think it's worth looking for a source that backs up the claim of greater resistance to foot rot. This has become axiomatic in Romney promotional literature, but is not likely to have an objective basis. It could easily be dropped and the space given to more secure claims to fame such as importance in the high-% wool floor covering industry and predominance as the foundation pure breed in NZ for the last 150 years. To add international perspectives, I have a nice picture of Romney ram lambs (borregos) in Uruguay. The breed standard (applicable in some countries mostly to showing, in others applied also to registration)is something we could go lightly on. The emphasis on nose color and hoof color is mostly aesthetic, and de gustibus non est diputandum. I'll try to send you something on the early history of the breed, or rather the early recognition of the breed, which is one of the more senior English breeds but not the most senior. Still don't feel ready to make any edits myself. Let's keep talking a while longer. Best, --Sawyer12477 23:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)sawyer12477

Hello again.

GA status- Good Article status, requirements found at WP:GA.

Since many readers of these articles aren't really involved in the sheep industry- as these articles are a lot more basic than many out there- I think if we can find a reliable source for the foot rot, it can be put in. It doesn't have to be long- just a sentence or two- but just a mention of it, as it would be something new to those who know nothing about Romneys. Thoughts?

What I've noticed about the article is that there's really nothing about the purpose of the Romney, just the appearance and characteristics, mainly. Adding info about the Romneys in the floor covering industry would be a great idea- but I really don't know much about that at all.

Please add the photo! The photo of the Romney ewes is from the farm where I'm based, and I was saying just today with a friend that we should replace it- it doesn't really show the Romney that well.

I think the section on Romney characteristics is needed, but as you said, the article should be focused a lot more on the uses of Romneys, history/origins, and doesn't need to lean as heavily on what they should look like.

As you said, I agree about the hoof and nose colour. It's not really important, but as the farm where I'm based focusses heavily on showing animals, a lot more emphasis is put on the colouring there. I think in the article we should really show all points of a romney, mentioning the ideal colouring, but as we both know, it's not of utmost importance, and more emphasis should be on the history of the breed, as you said.

The information would be welcome, if you could send it to me.

Do you feel there are more sections that could go into the article? I'll have to look at external websites, but I think we've covered a lot. Cheers- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 10:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello, I'll be pegging away, get something to you soon. I,m about to call some in NZ about Romney genetics, bit it's not for wiki. I looked at some of the other sheep breed articles in Wiki and the Romney page is a lot further along than most already. Will look up about GA status. Checked your user page trying to reply to you and see you raise Romneys in Australia. Good on yer! Sawyer 12477 Sawyer12477 19:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC) Sawyer 12477

Hello again! Just got back from a cattle workshop, so I'm trying to get back into the sheep frame of thought!

Yes, I work on a farm that raises Romneys over here. The lambing's been really good, the flock's looking really promising.

After reading that reply, I just had a look at some of the other sheep breed pages, and you're right! Heaps of really small articles, not much information at all... I'll be working on the Charolais and Angus articles next, but I'm determined to do the Romney page first!

If you could get that information to me that would be good. I'm going to be going through my computer for some documents I was given, but I don't think there's a lot, most of it's on cattle. Cheers- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 05:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music and sources

As part of the Alternative music WikiProject, we're gathering a list of sources on this page. Could you take a look and perhaps add any written references you have access to? Thanks! By the way, welcome to the project :) CloudNine 16:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 15	9 April 2007	About the Signpost

Danny Wool regains adminship in controversial RFA	Leak last year likely to produce changes for handling next board election
Association of Members' Advocates' deletion debate yields no consensus	WikiWorld comic: "Fake shemp"
News and notes: Donation, Version 0.5, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Wow, I got smiled at! Thanks, that brightened up my day a little. I even stopped by Cattle judging and rewrote it some, so there. I'm glad you like the Princess Bride, isn't it amazing? See you! Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 22:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Haha, glad it did. Wow, that rewrite was great... I've been meaning to do it for ages, then start and kind of... stop. You did it really well, thanks!

It's an amazing movie! Cheers- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 08:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Hi CattleGirl,

 As such I haven't required any help as of now. Thank you for your support, you may remove adoption template. I will contact you in case I need help. Thanks again Nadesai 17:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Romney page

Hello, cattle girl, I will try to send you a draft and a couple of pictures. What I've done is quite long,but I guess wiki does not really have limitations on space, right? I have also looked at the article on "wool" since we could save space on the Romney page if able to refer to the wool article for discussion of fiber diameter and coefficient of variation. If you look at the wool article you will see I accidentally edited it with what I thought was a discussion. Here goes an attempt to send you text, no photos yet.

The Romney (sheep)

The Romney, once called the Romney Marsh or the Kent sheep, is a “long-wool” breed that emerged in England by 1800. Exported to other continents, the Romney is now the world’s second (to the Merino) most economically important sheep breed. This position comes from the breed’s past and continuing majority share of the New Zealand sheep-meat and wool export trades.

Origins

The breed developed in Kent and East Sussex in and around the small area of low-lying meadows collectively known since the Middle Ages as “Romney Marsh.” [Need to link from those two words to Wiki article on Romney Marsh]. For many centuries sheep were brought to this district from other parts of England for autumn finishing. Although chilly in winter and fever-ridden, “The Marsh” contained rich pastures of alluvial soil “inned” (protected by dikes) from the sea between 1150 and 1400. This made for good pre-market grazing. The sheep recognized by 1800 as “Romney Marsh” or “Kent” were descended from some of the seasonal incomers retained and admixed with blood from Northern Europe. “Romneys are said to be somewhat resistant to foot rot, liver flukes and other problems that often plague sheep in damp pastures.” Simmons P, Ekarius C Storey’s Guide to Raising Sheep. North Adams MA, Storey Books, 2001 p. 68

Appearance To describe a sheep breed, pictures are useful but not always generalizable. “Breed standards” have been developed for most registered sheep breeds of the world, usually by the registering body itself. Some breed standards emphasize outward appearance; others give more weight to heritable characteristics. Some specify lower or upper limits of size. Most of the text of any breed standard describes an overall sound animal rather than breed-distinguishing features. That said, here is the standard of the oldest of the Romney breed societies, that of England (founded 1895) as it was set out in 1990.

The Official Description of the typical Romney sheep is as follows: Head wide, level between ears, with no horns nor dark hair on the poll. Eyes should be large, bright and prominent and the mouth sound. Face in ewes full, and in rams broad and masculine in appearance. Nose and hooves should be black. Neck well set in at the shoulders, strong and not too long. Shoulders well put in and level with the back. Chest wide and deep. Back straight and long, with a wide and deep loin. Rump wide, long and well-turned. Tail set almost even with the chine. Thighs well let down and developed. The face should be white, and the skin of a clean pink colour. Ribs should be well sprung. Legs well set, with good bone and sound feet. Sheep should stand well on their pasterns. The fleece should be of white colour, even texture and a good decided staple from top of head to end of tail and free from kemp. Source: Approved at the Annual General Meeting of Members of the Romney Sheep Breeders’ Society, Great Britain, published in the Centenary Handbook of the Romney Sheep Breeders’ Society (1995)

Today’s Romney sheep varies among and also within continents, especially as to body size. The breed can still be characterized in that respect as being in the larger half of the spectrum represented say by Cheviot (smaller end) to Lincoln (larger end). An English description of size (Centenary Handbook, p. 4) speaks of “big sheep” ewes to 85 kg, rams to 110 kg, while the American breed standard calls for ewes at breeding age to be “140 lbs or more” and rams “200 lbs or more.” www.americanromney.org The registering bodies for most sheep breeds continue to struggle with the question of what size is just right. This question has no transnational or even national answer. Relevant issues include economics, ecology, and the exigencies (in some countries) of the show ring.

As with body size, criteria for the ideal Romney fleece vary place to place, but breeders in all countries would agree that bold crimp (undulations along the fibre from butt to tip) and bold lock formation characterize the Romney fleece. A healthy mature ram not worked too hard can yield at shearing upwards of 10 kg per year, while flock averages in NZ for reproducing animals are typically above 5 kg. The increased fleece weight of a long-wooled sheep comes from the longer fiber length produced. A finer-wooled sheep (e.g. Merino, Rambouillet) actually has more wool follicles than the long-wooled sheep, but each supports a slower-growing, and therefore shorter, fiber. The “clean yield” [net weight after thorough washing] is typically high for Romneys, 75-80%; this is a higher yield than is got for most fine-wooled sheep.

The single most important dimension of wool, which above all else determines its best use, is average fiber diameter (AFD). High AFD indicates best use in carpeting and other rugged uses; lowest AFD wools are destined for fine suit fabrics and luxury wear. Average fiber diameter must be measured with instruments; the time-honored “Bradford system,” which uses the eyes and hands of experienced humans, has some correlation to measured AFD but can be biased. [is there a wiki entry on the Bradford system? We’d better put one in if there is not]. Again, countries differ in what they expect in a Romney fleece and in how this is expressed. America, for example, declares the Romney fleece should be [Bradford system] “44s to 50s.” Transformed arbitrarily into micrometers (microns) this corresponds to 29.30 to 36.19 microns, much “stronger” than average fiber diameter found in “fine” and“superfine” breeds like some Merinos. Breed standards notwithstanding, many Romneys considered outstanding in all respects by competent judges have AFDs above 36 microns.

In all breeds of wool sheep, uniformity of fiber diameter over body areas that grow good wool is almost as important as average fiber diameter. Too much variation in AFD makes yarns harder to spin well, especially in mills. The ratio of standard deviation to mean (average) fiber diameter is called the coefficient of variation. The lower this ratio, the better. The subject is important because no discussion of wool quality statistics is complete without mention of dispersion. The single most important end-use of Romney wool is in yarns for high-quality floor coverings, and mills that make carpet yarns have a special interest in strong wools with relatively low variability in AFD.

The Romney’s fleece is ideal for hand-spinning, and is often recommended to beginners. In the United States, where there is no commercial end-use for strong wools, the most desired outlet for Romney wool is to hand-spinners. Only a small fraction of the thousands of Romney fleeces shorn in the US each year, however, go to this use. Romney wool in NZ goes mostly into that country’s vast shipments of wool for the rug and carpet factories of the EU, the USA, Australia and NZ itself. New Zealand is the world’s largest producer and exporter of “crossbred” wool (a term for wool with average fiber diameter >35.4 microns). In 2002-2003 the country exported approximately 138,000 tonnes clean basis, about half of which was of AFD >35.4 microns, the Romney range. Source Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries New Zealand. In the same year, total wool exports returned nearly one billion $NZ, about 3% of total merchandise exports revenues for the country.

In North America and England, natural-colored Romneys (whose fleeces are not white, but black, gray, silver, brown, variegated) came to be valued rather than extirpated, for the interest they brought to hand-spinners and weavers who like the palette of natural colors. Traditionally, as everyone remembers, natural colored (formerly known “black”) sheep were detested because even a small amount of black fiber such as comes off a forgotten coin-sized spot on an otherwise white sheep can ruin hundreds of pounds of fiber and a grower’s reputation. Since 1973 natural-colored Romneys have been registered with the American Romney Breeders’ Association (founded 1911), which has developed a special breed standard for them.

Usefulness of Romneys

The first confirmed export of Romneys from England was a shipment of twenty from Stone, Kent that went on the Cornwall to NZ in 1853. With these and a further thirty ewes sent in 1856, Alfred Ludlum established New Zealand’s first Romney Marsh stud in 1860 in the Hutt Valley. In 1855 there had been 60,000 Merinos in NZ, but the Romney Marsh sheep thrived, supplanting the Merino over most of the country. The New Zealand Romney Marsh Association was formed in 1904. Alfred Matthews was the first president; the stud he founded, Waiorongamai, is still going. In 1965 three-quarters of the national flock was Romney source McKenzie Anna A Century of the NZ Romney New Zealand Farmer 2000: 7: 14-19

In the mid-1990s www.meatandwoolnz.com Romneys comprised 58% of the New Zealand sheep flock (estimated in 2000 at 45 million), with Coopworths (originally Border Leicester on Romney crosses) ) and Perendales (originally Cheviot on Romney crosses) making up another 16.6% of the national flock, in which Merinos stood at 7% and Corriedales at 5.5%. The sheer number of Romney ewes and lambs in New Zealand make the breed the major input to the country’s export lamb trade, as purebreds and first-generation crosses. NZ , with its 47% share, is the world’s largest exporter of lamb www.maf.govt.nz/statistics In 2004 NZ sheep-meat exports (mostly of lamb) brought in more than half of the country’s 4.5 billion $NZ meat export revenues.

The New Zealand export lamb trade started in 1882 with a shipment aboard the Dunedin of 4000 chilled carcasses to London’s Smithfield Market. To this day Feb 15, departure date, is celebrated as New Zealand Lamb Day.

For many years England was the primary source of Romneys for export to the world, although NZ was itself exporting by around 1906. Between 1900 and 1955 eighteen thousand rams and 9000 went from England to 43 countries. Source Centenary Handbook p. 20 Health requirements in recent decades have made New Zealand almost the only breeding ground for exported seed stock, with Brazil, Uruguay, the Falklands, the U.S. and England itself some of the recipients of rams and of semen for AI. END OF DRAFT

Can I send pictures this way too? Let me know. Can I send text as an attachment rather than putting it into body of email?

That seems to be going in. The references need checking and postioning.

Thanks,

--Sawyer12477 23:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC) sawyer12477

Wow, that's good. You wrote that, right?

If so, do you want to put it in the article, or me to? I can format it later if you like, but that reads well.

You can send me an email off wiki here if you want to with the picture, and some text, or you can continue this way. You can also send me links to pictures if they're on the internet? You can attach text if you send it off-wiki too.

So that's all good... more information in the wool article would be welcome, definitely. We could also summarise a bit in the Romney article, and just place links to the wool article, that would work.

I don't think there's an article on the bradford system, so we should add it, you're right. Or into the wool article, depending on how much information we can find.

I think that's about all I meant to say... it can all be put in, except some more explaining should be done, for not everyone would know what the poll, for example, is. There's a couple of things like that, a couple of things that can be merged into the wool article with some links. Other than that, as I said before, it's really good.

That's all I can think of for now...

Thanks- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 10:41, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 16	16 April 2007	About the Signpost

Encyclopædia Britannica promoted to featured article	Wikipedia continues to get mixed reactions in education
WikiWorld comic: "Hodag"	News and notes: Wikipedia television mention makes news, milestones
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi!

Signed your autograph book! Happy Collecting! --24.136.230.38 21:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, ok, thanks. Hey, just adding to what others have said before me... do you think you'll get an account... adding my 2c I think you should! Anyway, cheers- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 09:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm back, sorta.  :)

I caught a bad cold near the end of my vacation that just won't let go. But we can start doing admin coaching soon. I'll have to look over the reading list and think of some things to start with. What kinds of things would you like to learn? -- Merope 13:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, that's a shame! I hope you get better soon.

What things would I like to learn? Various things... deleting, blocking, that's two I can thing about at the moment... they're the sort of things I'd be focusing on as an admin, I think. CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 07:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

who?????

who are katmandu and olivia??? there is something written in their three cheers for sweet revenge cd???66.215.183.113 02:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean. Did you read this in an article? CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 07:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 17	23 April 2007	About the Signpost

Administrator goes rogue, is blocked	Wales unblocks Brandt, then reverses himself
Historian detained after his Wikipedia article is vandalized	Efforts to reform Requests for Adminship spark animated discussion
Canadian politician the subject of an edit war	Virginia Tech massacre articles rise to prominence
Wikipedia enters China one disc at a time	WikiWorld comic: "Buttered cat paradox"
News and notes: Unreferenced biographies, user studies, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

HEY!!!!!!

Hey waz up?Are you a Panic! fan?If u r totally cool.I also love Dave Matthews Band,Third eye Blind,artists Mika,and Lily Allen.But Panic! takes it to a whole notha level. -Ryanluvsme [but bden luvs me more]Believe me its true.Seriously.p.s. can i change my nickname? CHEERS!!!!!!!!!!!!peace.

Romney sheep

 Hello Cattle Girl, about the Romney page I may be missing something via email. Please let me know if you got a version about 4 days ago that had three additional photographs in it.  I am hoping you can post that version, while keeping the photo of ewe and twin lambs.   I hink you replied to that e-mailing from me but I have not seen your reply.  Was it off Wiki?  Where should I look for it?  Thanks             --Sawyer12477 22:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Sawyer12477

Adoption Request

Hi, i am seeking adoption to learn more about how to be a editor for Wiki. My main interests are music (mainly rock bands) and Australian articles. I am from Queensland, Australia.Boylo 01:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Boylo (talk • contribs) 01:52, 27 April 2007 (UTC).

Will you adopt me?

Hello CattleGirl!

I was wondering if you would adopt me as I am a newbie. After reading the bio's from other adopters, you sounded like a cool person that had similar interests to mine. I love rock music and also play the guitar. I'm also on wikipedia everyday but mostly to read articles. I'm looking to update or even create new articles, but I lack the experience and knowledge to make a submission that meets wikipedia standards. I could fumble around and try to learn this on my own, but I thought It would be cool to be adopted and meet other wiki users. Hope to hear from you.

Cheers! Alcoholica1 06:57, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Sure, I'll adopt you. It's cool that I can work alongside someone with the same interests as me...

You don't seem to have been given the official welcome yet, so I've posted it above. In there is heaps of links that would be helpful to you to know some more about the wiki, if you're interested.

Do you have any questions at the moment?

Cheers- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 08:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Romney sheep

Hello, I seem to have lost touch with you about the Romney sheep article changes. You may be away, or not getting my e-mails because I sent them wrong. Maybe just too busy! Do update me please on whether you got a proposed revision of the article, which included three new photos. I sent you the revision, rather than putting something right onto the page, for three reasons: first, I regard you as the editor of that page and prefer not to change it without your agreement; second, the text I sent needed marking-up to get internal and external links in the right format. I took a stab at that but did not get it all right, I know; third, I don't know at all how to put photos in.

I think I've learned enough now to be able to enter text, though not just right. Clueless on pictures.

By the way, the article will need a category tag of your choice. I only just learned about those. Perhaps would suffice or maybe something more vertical.

If I don't hear from you at all in a few days I will try to post the revision as it now stands, but I hope to hear from you. Cheers, Sawyer12477 12:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Sawyer12477