Talk:Reebok

Fashion Start‑class High‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Original Research tag added to recent news section. There is no evidence that the given reason is the real reason behind the loss in revenue Aniket ray 13:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed this phrase: "However, many people are saying that even with the combined "power" of Reebok and Adidas, they will still be behind Nike." This is hearsay and lacks substantiation. trialsanderrors 09:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please edit this sentence "Reebok's early beginnings date back to before 1900, founded by a young runner Joseph William Foster and his father Joseph B. Foster under a company called J.W. Foster and Sons Limited (formed 1939) by Joseph Williams' sons John and James of Bolton, Lancashire, Great Britain." - I had to read it quite a few times to understand what was actually being said. I still don't understand, who founded the company? JW and his father JB or was it JW's sons?

Reebok Logo

Can anyone tell me what the reebok symbol is called? I have done a lot of research and cannot find it. Thanks!

The logo of reebok has a name, "Vector". I presume that the logo represents the massive magnitude and uplooking direction (as in the geometry term, "vector") that the company wishes to portray to the public and the buyers of reebok apparel. I found "Vector" below my reebok shoe box.
See more here
Sjsharksrs 09:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The current iteration of the Reebok logo design is called the "vector." It is an update of the original logo design which was called the "stripe check." 24.147.126.167 02:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)anon[reply]

DMX Line

Shouldn't the DMX line be included in the article?

It's added. Sjsharksrs 08:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bedding

I have heard that Reebok has their own line of bedding; is it true? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shawkf (talk • contribs) 17:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

No

Bias point of view

It is not universally accepted that "sweatshops" are bad. If the labor is voluntary and those working there are better than not working there then "human rights" have not been infringed. Merely tossing this in accepts a priori that sweatshops are bad.