Talk:Susie Castillo
Biography Unassessed | |||||||
|
Beauty Pageants Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Marine 69-71
Hey buddy, I don't know who you think you are threatening me "that you're gonna block me" if I do this or that, but you don't scare me "bro".
Susie Castillo is Puerto Rican and Dominican, am I right? So then what's the point in saying "she considers herself Puerto Rican and Dominican" when she is both? I would hope she considers herself both since she is, but there's no point in saying that. That would be like me saying I consider myself white. If I considered myself Chinese, people would think I'm crazy. In the interview you're using as a source, she's saying that officially, she is both, something we could already figure out.
Now I really don't care because it's not that important but I aint gonna deal with some dude online threatening to block me over something he's wrong about. Bowser Koopa
- The article sourced talks about herself as a Puerto Rican. I think the Dominican statement in the sentence can go since it doesn't really address that issue, but it's a sourced statement leading to an article written by the subject herself and fleshes out who she is, and should be included. Whether the wording needs to be tooled with is another story. --David Shankbone 17:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Location of "Succession" boxes
The "Succession" boxes at the bottom of many of the Miss Massachusetts' articles are placed after the "References" and "External Links" sections. I think they seem to be lost down there, and should be moved to above the "References" section, because the articles seem to end once you hit the "footnotes," which I most often do not read.
If the "Succession" boxes were placed above the "Reference" section, they would become much more apparent and therefore useful to everyone, I believe. SeanMon 06:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes but they don't look as good where you suggest (in my opinion) and if they were changed, to keep things consistent, over 100 articles would need to be edited. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 07:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Birth date
I think her date of birth is wrong. how can she be a Scorpio and born in January? if she was born in January then she is either a Sagitarius or a Capricorn right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.180.75.234 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
this guy seems to be right. I just did a search and I couldn't find a page with her birth date and zodiac sign on the same page, they either list her birthdate in January or her zodiac sign as Scorpio. her own myspace page www.myspace.com/susiecastillo says she's a Scorpio, so that would mean she wasn't born in January. I'll leave someone else to figure this one out, cause I don't really feel like it. I'm sure there's a simple answer. Axem Black