User talk:82.45.15.121

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 82.45.15.121 (talk) at 16:16, 21 October 2007 (→‎Comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from SqueakBox! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Please use an account if you wish to be an anonymous user. By editing without creating an account you leave your IP address for all to see and this may locate you to your nearest city and certainly will identify the country you are in. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here is a list of useful links:

Again, welcome, SqueakBox 22:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SqueakBox and Pol64

Hi there, I had also been under the impression that Pol64 was a mere SqueakBox invention and I have also filed a checkuser request for this but now I have come to the conclusion that they are really two different persons with similar opinions, one in Honduras and one in Britain. Apologies to SqueakBox and Pol64. Roman Czyborra 12:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the apology though I only just found it. Sigh, SqueakBox 16:13, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I wasn't removing the comments of a user banned for an inappropriate user name but one banned multiple times for sock abuse, POV pushing et al. Restoring comments of banned users is a blockeable offence so please do not do so again, SqueakBox 16:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody is calling you a whore but if you act as the meatpuppet of a banned user you will be blocked, SqueakBox 16:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia has no current information pointing towards Richard Laube as a banned user. You are free to request a checkuser, but for as long as you assume bad faith, you are the user offending here + frankly living in a dream world where you determine the "truth" that we must all abide by.
Users are allowed to support others by reverting censorious edits. This is nothing like meatpuppetry, and you will find that I have made previous edits. You seemed to call me a whore in an edit summary. 82.45.15.121 16:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It sounds like you are also a banned user from your spiel (claiming to know what wikipedia has), and users are not allowed to act as proxies for banned users which you are doing. Richard Laube is clearly a sock of a banned suer, you don't need RCU to confirm that and nor will I wait up to days for an RCU while allowing banned users' comments to stand. Given the situation I am not assuming bad faith but you and others (or you alone) are clearly trying to disrupt the mediation in a bad faith way so do not do so. Laube's comments ca also be removed as personal attacks which if you had read them you would know, SqueakBox 16:11, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What is clear should be supportable by Wikipedia. If it is so clear, why don't you ask admins to confirm it, so that you don't get your reverts reverted? Please clarify the personal attacks. Please clarify why the edits of banned editors (assuming...) must be reverted?
Sounds like a moral crusade to me. 82.45.15.121 16:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:82.45.15.121&oldid=166072269"