Jump to content

User talk:Arjun01

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Swadhyayee (talk | contribs) at 19:02, 23 October 2007 (Hi! Can you please?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

NOTE

DUE TO SCHOOL, ARJUNA CANT EDIT DURING WEEKDAYS
thanks for your understanding ~ 01er 18:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

The heading says it all :) --DarkFalls talk 02:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, long time no see - welcome back for your aniversary! Ryan Postlethwaite 02:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto! Abecedare 03:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
?!?! You're back Arjun! :D --PrestonH 03:52, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're back! Good to see you buddy, hope it's permanent : ) ~ Riana 04:03, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And from me too, good to see you around. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw your name in my watchlist. I'm glad you've decided to come back. ^^ // DecaimientoPoético 15:32, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, welcome back. :) — Malcolm (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks everyone, you guys are awesome; to andonic: ive been really busy this summer. ~ 01er 18:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Are you back permanently? I sure hope you are!! Cheers!!! Ninetywazup?Review meMy ToDosign here! 16:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah man, i really honestly want to be crazy active like i used to be but i know that in my current position its almost impossible. I can barely get through the day now, but yeah. Ill really try to check on things during weekdays to the best i can. Cheers! ~ 01er 23:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can't believe I haven't seen this yet. Welcome back! I'll take inspiration from you and stop editing Wikipedia in the weekdays too, starting from now. :) GizzaDiscuss © 07:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good to know, 01 (I was kidding about being annoyed though; and I was busy over summer as well). You'll be editing a bit on weekends then? · AndonicO Talk 15:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, am I missing something here? ;) Fredil 20:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, surprise...surprise... :-D M.(er) 07:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Likewise ;) I've been away, and so just noticed! Great to see you again. Anthøny 16:20, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

guitar project

Dear Arjun, my name's mike and i'm a member of wikiproject guitarist and I was wondering if you could help me as you were the one sending me emails- there's an article that needs some work, the article is the lead guitar article- it needs expanding, explanations of blues and rock guitar and some ammending, i've done what I can to make it more neutral but I don't want to explain things that are out of my expertise, that is why I am hoping to enlist the help of the guitar wikiproject, may I (or you) consider putting this article in the list of guitar themed articles that need expanding?

Yours sincerely, --Mikeoman 13:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

My RFA
Thanks for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with 58 supports, 1 opposes, and 1 neutral. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified. Addhoc 18:22, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Autograph book

Do you have one? Also, can you sign mine? Thanks!!! Cheers!!! Ninetywazup?Review meMy ToDosign here! 17:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Family Style

The article family_style you made a while back...you really should fix it up now that you know how wikipedia works, Im guessing you made it in reference to Stevie Ray and Jimmie Vaughn's album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.11.32.84 (talk) 06:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007 newsletter for WikiProject Abandoned Articles

Welcome

The WikiProject welcomes two new members in the past three months:

Progress

The WikiProject is now halfway done, numerically, with the 1000 articles identified in December 2006. The first (oldest) 500 articles have been claimed, reviewed, and (when needed, which was almost all cases) improved. Moreover, given the passage of time, many of articles 501 through 1000 have been worked on by other editors (it's ten months since that list was generated). So reviewing the second half of the 1000 articles should be easier.

A slightly different approach

Section 6 (articles 501 through 600 on the list) has been organized differently than the previous five sections. First, blocks are (roughly) five articles each, rather than 10, making it easier for you to claim and finish a block. Second, perhaps more importantly, each block consists of similar pages; if you're interested in fixing disambiguation pages, there are blocks of those; if you're interested in articles (which is what the project originally started out being), there are blocks of those; and there is one block of lists and one of redirects (mostly redirects to articles). So, fewer surprises this time when you claim a block.

In addition, since the project now has 25 active members (though some are likely inactive), having more blocks will make it easier to spread the editing around.

Inactivating your membership

If you received this newsletter on your user talk page and don't want to receive such postings in the future, please move your name, in the participants section of the WikiProject, to the "Inactive" subsection.

About this newsletter

This newsletter is being delivered by Anibot; it was written by John Broughton. Please post any comments about it to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Abandoned Articles, in a section separate from the newsletter itself.
Delivered by Anibot 00:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing you a happy Dashera.

Dashera just onset this moment and my first wishes to you "Happy Dashera". I logged on after 22 weeks - so late that forgot password and editing both. Hope you are fine.

swadhyayee 18:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Can you please?

Can you please protect the article Swadhyay Pariwar? It was un-protected and history seems to repeat.

swadhyayee 19:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]