User talk:Alientraveller

Archives: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8

Introduction

Hey man, take it as a compliment. Don't be all mushy on me princess.user talk:Wildroot|(Contact me)]] 11:14, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Spidey

We definitely could, since the other two films are GA and the film series page is GA. But, we may need to have more than just one article FA, we might need the majority of them to be FA. I don't know the requirements though.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 18:34, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Today was the first time I've even heard of WP:FT. :-P Thanks for the learinin', AT. I feel like we're getting ahead of ourselves, though... why don't we finish up Batman Begins for Featured Article status first? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, if you want to focus on Spider-Man 3, I definitely recommend the making-of book. It is so loaded with information about production that it made my head hurt. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:36, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I've attempted to snap images from the film, but for some reason it doesn't work. I have PowerDVD, but, unless there is something I have turn on/off, I cannot get a screencap from it. When I try, I just get a black image.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 16:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

The point is to be comprehensive, and I can still access the page with relatively quick load time. ;) I don't what it is, but I think the newer the DVD the less likely it is that you can capture a screenshot. Though, there's probably some program that can do it, PowerDVD I don't believe is one of them, because you can find screenshots all over the web.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 16:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Bats

Yeah, I'd say to attempt a summary. I'll take a look at it in-depth myself to see what could be used from there. I would suggest, though, to have a stand-alone Themes section -- for what Nolan intended, then what has been perceived by others. I suggest this because Nolan's quote from VFXWorld and his perspective about themes in that BOM interview wouldn't belong in a Reaction section. I think it's better roofed under Themes, both intended and unintended (in that order). What do you think? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:14, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Heroes Episodes

great link, I'll bring it to the project page. Actually, I'm not looking to keep or merge/redirect any or all of them, I simply wnat Our project to handle it internally if we can. I do not expect all of the episodes to survive as full articles; but do expect the premiere and finales, the five years ahead and the flashback episodes to survive easily. there's a LOT of material to use, and hopefully we can do so. Certainly the multiple articles in Empire and EW will help out. ThuranX 19:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Images

Very true; I agree that the new images work with the article a lot better than the previous set. I want to restore the DVD cover, though... there's a citation somewhere that talked about the packaging. I'll have to find it before I put in the cover. I asked the admin about the appropriateness of the image at Sunshine (2007 film)#Cast, and he didn't think it fit, so that would make something like the image at American Gangster#Production not workable, either. Also, he even said that he was one of the more lenient admins in terms of fair use, which is quite the terrifying thought. Now, I just need to find time to summarize the interpretations of Fight Club so I can put it up for the FAC process. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:20, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

I know, but considering that admins have the power and we don't, I'm going to see what else could be implemented. I haven't seen Sunshine yet, and there's a few more headlines on the talk page to include. Perhaps I can find some appropriate screenshots like Fight Club. American Gangster is kind of difficult, though... it's a "conventional" film, so I doubt there's going to be anything seriously unique in its production design to warrant discussion. It'd probably be character-driven, and Washington and Crowe don't look much different than they do in person. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Potted Plant 3

Okay having watched Potter's 2 & 3 again, I definitly going to do 3. As, its a lot darker and cinematically different to the first two. So if you do in your travels find any basic production and cinematic style sources, and anything that compares it to the previous two films, then please wing them my way. Gran² 18:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah well, I've started a lot of things (Star Wars cast for example) but I hadn't actually fully decided yet... Gran² 19:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

spiderman 3

The reason i made the home section is because it took to long for me to find it myself.--Playstationdude 19:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I understand about the image. I will instead put the complete trilogy info and pic up.--Playstationdude 20:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Didn't even know that page existed.--Playstationdude 20:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Cloverfield

I'm not very good with articles, I admit, but the evidence for Tagruato being connected to Slusho! and Cloverfield cannot be ignored. Slusho! has been put in because a major news site referenced it. Tagruato was found after that chef pic on the 1 18 08 website was put up. Before it went up the site could not be found. Tagruato links to Slusho!, and vice versa. I do not wish to vandalise, I only wish to present what I know is right. If you can help me out, I'd appreciate it. --General Holtarna 13:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

If I were to rephrase it, cite the connection, and remove the gamejack comment, would it be ok? --General Holtarna 13:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

FF

Galactus wasn't that bad. It was the Surfer's film, not Galactus's, and it's hard to make a character like Galactus work on the big screen (I like him, but he is ludicrous, let's face it). I think the Surfer movie might be pushing their luck... Elektra Natchios was cool in Daredevil, but her own movie looks terrible (I haven't bothered to see it). I'm not too excited about Magneto either. Just because a character works, doesn't mean they need their own film. I was surprised at how genuinely funny Invisible Woman was in FF2; I was even laughing with her some of the time, which was a change. The scene where she's on fire is hilarious. So, who do you want to be the big bad of FF3? I'm pushing for Namor, but it seems unlikely, since he's getting his own film. Paul730 13:46, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

I have low expectations for a Surfer movie. As cool as he is in FF2, I ask myself "If they can barely adapt great characters like the FF, Hulk, and Daredevil into good movies, what chance do they have with someone like Surfer?" (who is far from the best Marvel character). The FF franchise kind of redeemed itself (at least in my eyes) with FF2, but they really seem to struggle turning these comics into films. My only hope is that they don't screw up the Avengers franchise. Hopefully since the characters are getting individual films, that'll make the Avengers movie a bit better, because the characters will be more developed. Oh, and I know zilch about Transformers so I didn't really understand that last sentence, lol. But Galactus did look cool in the Marvel video game. Paul730 14:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Um, because I'm more interested in the fictional characters than the people behind the scenes? :P I know some stuff about the current writers, and some of the old X-Writers (ie, Claremont), but not Marvel writers in general. Galactus might be cool if he was fully-realised, I'm just not really that bothered. I was happy with the cloud. Paul730 14:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

I didn't think Doom was that bad in it. The whole "wanting to steal the Surfer's board" thing is from the comics isn't it? (I remember seeing it in the old cartoon) I dunno, the film wasn't perfect by a long shot but it was just such a vast improvement on the first one that I can't help but like it. I can see the third one being rubbish though, as I said, I can't see anyone except Namor being able to top Surfer. Paul730 14:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Evans and Chiklis are okay, I haven't been blown away by any of the cast TBH. I'd like to see more of an actual heroic side to Johnny, as opposed to just attention-seeking. I think the Thing should be a bit uglier - he looks too much like She-Thing. They revealed in the comics that his power is constantly evolving, so it would make sense continuity-wise if he got a bit more deformed. It might be quite cool if Doom was the Big Bad of FF3, he needs more time in the spotlight without other stories getting in the way. I like Julian Whatshisname but admittedly he isn't a very effective Doom. Not regal enough, as you said. It would be cool to have a showdown in Latveria, maybe base the film on Unthinkable which is my favoutite FF story (the one where Doom sends Franklin to hell). Paul730 15:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

If they make an "X-Kids" movie, who would you like it to star? I'm sure Iceman, Kitty, Rogue, and Colossus will feature, but they're so bland in the movies I hope they beef up the cast a bit. Emma Frost is a must, it'd be cool to see a rivalry between her and Storm as the two mentors at the school. I'd love to see the current New X-Men, but they'll probably throw in a few New Mutants instead. Paul730 15:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

X-Men

A Cyclops and Emma relationship would be cool, and allow Cyclops to be something other than Wolverine's love rival. I think Wolverine's role should be played down, I'm kind of sick of him. What do you mean, a "younger" Emma? She's only 27 in the comics (if you believe her, lol). Do you think they should make another trilogy, focusing on Apocalypse? It'd be cool to have an Age of Apocalypse/Days of Future Past adaptation with time travel. I'd like to see Madrox again, maybe as an unwilling Horseman of Apocalypse or something? I love Madrox. Paul730 15:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

If they made time travel somebody's powers as opposed to technology it might not seem ridiculous. Certainly no more ridiculous than weather manipulation etc. They could use Quicksilver, he's a time traveller now, and Callisto already filled the "super speedster" role, so no point in repeating it. Emma is brilliant, she's one of my favourite X-Men. Typical Emma quote;

Jean: I think this year's students are a terrific bunch.

Emma: Well, that's very civil of you Jean. Only you would use the words terrific bunch to dignify this horde of ghastly illiterates.

Lol, how can anyone not love that woman. :P Paul730 15:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Can I ask why X-Men Origins: Wolverine is created? Announcement of a title and a release date doesn't equate certainty, and filming is not until December 2007. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:13, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Future films

I've created a future film watchlist using THR's production listing. Gives us an idea of what exists and what doesn't. Some links are probably too vague (purposely so disambiguation links can be checked for). Feel free to make comments on the talk page. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Hulk

can you please review my sandbox version of an improved, cited, Out of Universe based Hulk article? I have a couple bits after the refs section to finish integrating, but a review would be appreciated. link Thanks. ThuranX 20:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Deep Space Homer

I've finished adding the production section and I've nominated it for GAC status. There's still some stuff that needs to be done though, the plot needs a copyedit (if you'd like to take care of that, it'd be much appreciated), and there are some things for the reception status that are yet to be added. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 04:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Infobox movie certificates

I'm considering Template:Infobox movie certificates for deletion. I've never seen the encyclopedic value in listing these certificates as part of a film article. It's been up for deletion before, and I was wondering if you saw any merits or flaws in this template. I'm formulating an argument for an eventual TFD, but I'd like to hear what you think about its usage. I'm asking because Pixelface inquired about my conduct in removing this template from Bee Movie, and I explained that some encyclopedic examples of rating information would be Live Free or Die Hard being rated PG-13 compared to its predecessors, the BBFC's rating treatment at Fight Club (film)#Release, or something like Disney's first PG-13 film being Pirates of the Caribbean (can't remember if this is true or not). Let me know your thoughts. I may bring up the matter on the WikiProject Films talk page to gauge the preferences of the community before proceeding with the TFD. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Jack Sparrow FAC

Heya, an article you contributed to extensively is being considered as a featured article candidate and is gaining a concensus of supports. If you wish to make a comment about the nomination, please feel free to do so--Hadseys 19:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

GACs

Hi, we have a few episode GACs that have been waiting for a while, so I was wondering if you could take a look at one or two of them. Thanks, Scorpion⁰⁴²² 21:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

"Vandalism" Warning

Just wanted to tell you that I wasn't the only one who added in that "Abner Ravenwood" information to the Indiana Jones article — there were several folks who also tried adding it after it was revealed on AICN, which scarcely counts as "vandalism." --139.67.70.62 21:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EarlyGollum.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EarlyGollum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back

I hate it when people ask me that question because I never know how to answer it. I have several favourites, Homer's Enemy, Cape Feare, Marge vs. the Monorail, Simpson Tide, You Only Move Twice, And Maggie Makes Three and several others. It's good to see you back and reviewin'. You picked a good time to because it looks like another FT drive has gained momentum so GA mania is back with a vengeance. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 15:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah welcome back, enjoy the holiday? Anyway, have you seen the Jack Sparrow FAC yet? Gran² 15:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Hopefully goning to see it tomorrow, well either that or Stardust, but I'd prefer to see Ratatouille though. Gran² 16:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back, pal! I hope you enjoyed your time away and didn't have to clean up too much on Wikipedia coming back. :) —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Yep, it definitely captures the spin-off feeling. No worries about Wolverine -- I've created duds myself, like Nottingham, which I userfied. Los Angeles Times reported a rapid rewrite for Wolverine before the strike, so hopefully there aren't any issues with it. The 2008 Hollywood strike is getting to be a big mess, forcing stuff like the JLA project into the pipeline. I've set up Google Alerts to see if I can clean up the aforementioned article; it'd be something of interest after the end of this month, I'm sure. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

I can't remember what's supposed to happen -- from what I hear, it's the WGA rattling their sabers. There's a couple of other organizations talking about striking, but it's mainly WGA. Thus it seems like an issue of being able to hired screenwriters to write. The studios are basically stockpiling scripts to use when the screenwriters can be hired. I've no idea if Transformers 2 is at risk, but I'm just glad that films already in production (The Dark Knight, The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man, etc.) will come out without a problem. It's just afterward that would be problematic. By the way, I saw Downfall, which was a pretty decent inside look at the last days of Berlin and the breakdown of Hitler. Have you seen The Lives of Others, though? It's another German film, this time about when Germany was divided into East and West. It beat Pan's Labyrinth for Best Foreign Film last year, and seeing both, I understand the victory. These days, though, I'm binging on Jericho. I also met up with my parents last night (as we meet somewhere between our home and where my university is), and I got season 1 of Heroes from them. I just got done with midterms for the semester, so I plan to do some serious lounging and snacking. :) Which is what I'm going to do now, actually, with disc 4 of Jericho. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Category:Post-credits scene films and Transformers (film)

Anon's are constantly adding Category:Post-credits scene films to the film - the cat is up for speedy here and possible salt. I've reverted twice already - don't want to face 3RR. master son^{T - C} 01:05, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Schindler's List

Hello I've made a few recent edits to Schindlers List and feel with a little work it could reach GA and with dedication, even FA. I am going to try to improve it as much as I can with the materials I have. I have decided not to try and get Spielbergs biography to GA, given that hes still doing so much! I thought Schindlers List, one of his finest works would merit at least a GA. Would you be interested in a joint mass improvement operation, working together to improve the article!? LordHarris 09:42, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Transformers

I'll see what I can do. It may not be till the weekend before I can sit down and listen to the commentary, since that usually takes longer than just viewing the film itself. Is there a place you'd like the information placed?  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 13:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Sure thing.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 17:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

F13 franchise

LOL, thanks. I still have a lot more to add in the development, merchandise, box office (going to change it to "reception" and add a bit of critical reaction), and try and create a cultural significance section. Did you see the audio file?  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 13:28, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it was my first audio upload, I was quite proud of myself with that one. What do you mean, "write like [I] do"? Like, writing in different sections out of chronological order? I have to do it that way, or else I'll get bored. I get bored working on one article for too long (hence the multiple sandboxes on my user page), so I try and fight it by working on a section here, and then a section waaay over here, so forth and so on.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 13:50, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Star Trek (film)

I replied in the talk page for the film, since it looks like more than just the two of us in the discussion, although you've probably already noticed, as you no doubt have the page in your watchlist. EvilCouch 17:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Lisa the Skeptic

• Thanks for taking a look at this GAC. I recently expanded the Production section with more background and info from the DVD commentary. Feel like taking another GAC look? Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 00:19, 1 November 2007 (UTC).

"Pirates" Future in "Pirates 3" Article

I'm going to re-add what you took away. True, I did take it from the main Pirates of the Caribbean artice, but actually, that section was originally in the At World's End article. And it's not really thunder... That wasn't the whole point of the main article. The thunder of that article was everything BUT that.

I'm gonna re-add it. There's no real reason to take that away.