Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/JoshuaZ

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007 | Vote

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. (talk | contribs) at 01:05, 3 December 2007 (→Support). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

JoshuaZ

As some of you may be aware, I'm a bit talkative. I've therefore taken the liberty of putting my full statement on a subpage. Thanks. JoshuaZ 00:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Rschen7754 (T C) 00:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ragesoss 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Experienced enough This is a Secret account 00:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Bakaman 00:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 01:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. Strong Oppose This canidate was a strong supporter of the Durova witchhunt, in which an innocent wikieditor was falsely accused by secret evidence, and later exonerated. The blocking was not the first "mistake" either. A vote for JoshuaZ is a vote in support of witchhunts like Durova's. Travb (talk) 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nufy8 00:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Doesn't appear to understand the gravity and seriousness of Durova's actions. Cla68 00:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. east.718 at 00:31, December 3, 2007
  5. Qst 00:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. iridescent 00:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Agree with Travb 1000% as a victim of said witchhunts by durova. JoshuaZ basically gave her a pass for her actions, and supported them at the time.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 00:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. - auburnpilot talk 00:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Per above reasoning, I agree, unfortunately. Sorry. • Lawrence Cohen 00:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Witch hunt is certainly an exaggeration, but the answer to the question travb linked causes me to doubt JoshuaZ's capability of neutrality. GracenotesT § 00:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Per Gracenotes. Prodego talk 00:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. – Gurch (talk) 00:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2007/Vote/JoshuaZ&oldid=175378719"